EFTA00204796.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From: "
\(USAFLS\)" <
To: "
. MUSAFLS \ )" <
Cc: "
MUSAFLS\)"
Subject: RE: Epstein
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:30:00 +0000
Importance: Normal
VLISAFLS\)"
Both the tone and substance of your email are totally inappropriate and, in combination with other matters in the past, it
seriously calls your judgment into question.
As you well know, the US Attorney has not even decided whether to go forward with a prosecution in this matter, thus you
should have respected his position before engaging in plea negotiations.
Despite being told
these things, you prepared a pros memo and indictment that included a definitive date for indictment. It has come to my
attention that you led the agents to believe that the indictment of this matter was a foregone conclusion and that our
decision to put off that date and listen to the defense attorne s' concerns is indicative of the office havin second thoughts
about indicting.
called me before, not after, the June 26th meeting. It was an informal discussion and not in the nature of an
official plea offer but rather a feelino out by both sides as to what it might take to resolve the matter.
should also know that my discussion with
was made with the US
Attorneys full knowledge. Had
expressed interest in pursuing this avenue further, I certainly would have
raised it with all the interested individuals in this case, including you and the agents. In any event, I fail to see how a
discussion that went nowhere has hurt our bargaining position. I am also quite confident that no one on the defense team
believes that the federal investigation in this matter has been for show.
Nor are your arguments that I have violated the Ashcroft memo, the USAM or any other policy well taken. As Chief of the
Criminal Division, I am the person designated by the US Attorney to exercise appropriate discretion in deciding whether
certain pleas are appropriate and consistent with the Ashcroft memo and the USAM — not you.
As for your statement that my concerns about this case hurting Project Safe Childhood are unfounded, I made it clear to
you that those concerns were voiced by the US Attorney. Whether or not you are correct, matters of policy are always
within his purview and any decisions in that area ultimately rest with him.
Finally, you may not dictate the dates and people you will meet with about this or any other case. If the US Attorney or the
First Assistant desire to meet with you, they will let you know. Nor will I direct Epstein's lawyers to communicate only with
you. If you want to work major cases in the district you must understand and accept the fact that there is a chain of
command - something you disregard with great regularity.
Ori inal Messa e
From:
. (USAFLS)
Sent: Wednesday. July 04, 2007 5:16 PM
To:
(USAFLS);
Subject: FW: Epstein
(USAFLS)
Hi
-- I am in trial, so I just got your message.
EFTA00204796
First, it is inappropriate for you to enter into plea negotiations without consulting with me or the investigative agencies, and
it is more inappropriate to make a plea offer that you know is completely unacceptable to the FBI, ICE, the victims, and
me. These plea negotiations violate the Ashcroft memo, the U.S. Attorney's Manual, and all of the various iterations of the
victims' rights legislation.
We left the meeting
on June 26th in a stronger position than when we entered, and your statement that a state resolution would satisfy us takes
away that advantage. If you make it seem like the U.S. Attorney doesn't have faith in our investigation, Epstein has no
incentive to make a deal.
Second, your discussion makes it appear that my investigation is for "show" only and completely undermines my ability to
deal with Epstein's attorneys directly. In my eight years of civil practice before the six ears that I have spent with this
Office), I have litigated against attorneys far more formidable than
and
and have managed to
convince the Eighth, Ninth, and Federal Circuits that my legislative interpretation was correct. Your concerns about this
prosecution hurting the rest of the Project Safe Childhood Program are unfounded.
My trial should end early next week. I would like to make a presentation to the U.S. Attorney, M, MI and you with our
side of the investigation and a revised indictment. The presentation will address the points raised by Epstein's counsel and
will convince you all of the strength of the case.
In the meantime, please direct all communications from Epstein's counsel to me.
Assistant U.S. Attorne
Ori inal Message
From:
(USAFLS)
Sent: Tuesda Jul 03. 2007 1:47 PM
To:
. (USAFLS)
Subject: Epstein
, my blackberry is giving me trouble so i'm using M. I told lily that a state plea with jail time and sex offender
status may satisfy the usa. It was a non-starter for them
Sent from my GoodLink synchronized handheld (www.good.com)
EFTA00204797
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00204796.pdf |
| File Size | 132.1 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 4,925 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T11:13:54.995830 |