EFTA00205212.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczekcegoyblack.com>
Subject: Doe I. USAO
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:48:01 +0000
Importance: Normal
Inline-
Images: ATT00001
In a little while, I will be filing Epstein's omnibus reply in support of his motion to intervene. It is one pleading,
that replies to your response and to Cassell's response. It was better and more efficient to do one pleading. It
will be 19 pages. Do you oppose a motion to file an overlong pleading? Cassell says he opposes anything longer
than 15 pages.
Also, my reply to Cassell's response to the supplemental briefing filed by the would-be intervenor lawyers is due
early next week. I will be filing a motion for an extension until October 31. Cassell has no objection. Can I say
the govt has no objection either?
Thanks,
Jackie Perczek, Esq.
The information in this email transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, nor
the employee or agent responsible
for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this
transmission (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
notify the sender by email reply. Thank you.
EFTA00205212
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00205212.pdf |
| File Size | 43.6 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,251 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T11:14:20.586402 |