EFTA00205419.pdf
Extracted Text (OCR)
Subject: Jane Doe Case
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:17:50 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: DE48-3_201
ictim_notification_Ittpdf; DE48-
4 20110321
icti
n_ltr.pdf; DE48-
6 20110321
f• DE48-
7 20110321
forSpdf;
DE48-
8 20110321 302 of
from Jan 2008.pdf;
DE48 20110321_Motn_for_finding_a_violation_of_CVRA.pdf; DE48-
2 20110321=M302.pdf
Hi Ed - FINALLY, I found it. Now I know why the court wants us to make our documents searchable.
See DE 48 at pages 3-4, paragraph #1. They specifically cite the Complaints and refer to Jane Does #1 and #2.
On page 5, paragraph 4, they make clear that Jane Doe #1 is
they attach as Exhibit B.
They also explain that Jane Doe #1 is MI n d Jane Doe #2 is
I by referring to their victim
notification lette
5&6, paragraphs 6&7, which they attach as Exhibits C&D. (See also paragraph 37
and Exhibit H re
Judge White granted my motion for extension of time this morning. I am running off to court now, but should be
back by 11:15. Let me know how I can help, okay?
, by referring to her 302, which
«DE48-3_21=1
im notification Itr.pdf>> <<D
01
ti
'
Lion Ittpdf>> «DE48-
6_20110321
1
df>> «DE48-7_20110321
r to
o
f>> «DE48-
8_20110321_302 of
from Jan 2008.pdf>> «DE48_20110321_Motn for finding a violation o CVRA.pdf>> «DE48-
2_20110321
•P f>>
EFTA00205419
Document Preview
Extracted Information
People Mentioned
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00205419.pdf |
| File Size | 52.3 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,322 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T11:14:21.387629 |
Related Documents
Documents connected by shared names, same document type, or nearby in the archive.