EFTA00205557.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 163 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2012 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2,
Plaintiffs,
1.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
In two decisions last term, the Supreme Court constitutionalized the right to competent
counsel in plea negotiations by ruling that the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of
counsel "extends to the plea bargaining process" and that defendants are entitled to "the effective
assistance of competent counsel" during plea negotiations. Lafler. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1376, 1384
(2012); Missouri. Frye, 132 S. Ct. 1399, 1407-09 (2012). Under Lofty. and Frye, counsel have
an ongoing obligation to provide effective representation in plea bargaining and to engage in
communications with the client and the prosecutor to discharge that obligation. The limited
intervenor lawyers and limited intervenor Jeffrey Epstein submit Leer and Frye in support of their
motions for protective orders and their objections to disclosure and use of plea negotiations by Jane
Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2.
The limited intervenors also submit Lafler and Frye in direct support of their arguments that
the Court should recognize a common-law privilege in this case under Rule 501 in part because plea
negotiations are an integral part of our criminal justice system. This was expressly recognized by the
EFTA00205557
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 163 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2012 Page 2 of 2
Supreme Court in Laf ler and Fiye when it found that "plea bargains are . . . central to the
administration of the criminal justice system" because ours is "a system of pleas, not a system of
trials":
Ninety-four percent of state convictions are the result of guilty pleas. The reality is
that plea bargains have become so central to the administration of the criminal justice
system that defense counsel have responsibilities in the plea bargain process,
responsibilities that must be met to render the adequate assistance of counsel that the
Sixth Amendment requires in the criminal process at critical stages. Because ours "is
for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials," it is insufficient simply to
point to the guarantee of a fair trial as a backstop that inoculates any errors in the
pretrial process.
Lafter, 132 S. Ct. at 1388; Fiye, 132 S. Ct. at 1407.
We certify that on April 18, 2012, the foregoing document was filed electronically with the
Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system.
Respectfully submitted,
BLACK, SREBNICK, KORNSPAN
& STUMPF, P.A.
2
EFTA00205558
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00205557.pdf |
| File Size | 101.5 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,737 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T11:14:22.516856 |