DOJ-OGR-00008010.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a fan) he be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LBAAMAX5ps government in support o A. Partially in support, Document 499-2 Filed 11/23/21 Page 142 of 1591 41 Rocchio - Cross f your testimony here today, correct? yes. Q. And this is by the same folks who did the 2020 study, Winters and Jeglic. Right? As YO@S8« Q. The abstract here -—-- this study was actually giving professionals a list, undergraduate students a list of potential grooming behaviors to see if they could identify grooming behaviors. And there were a total of 393 Do you recall that? undergraduate students who were provided with this information. A. I don't recall specifically. [ recog -- I can recall. This was the article that -- in which -- they did two things. They developed the model, which they later tested. And then they created a or not grooming behaviors cou Q. Right. behaviors could not be predicted. A. Correct. scenario in which they attempted to see whether And the results of ld be predicted. this study were that grooming Correct? Q. And this is what ended up with the 2020 attempt to validate the model, A. So youtre t which they're still working on. Right? alking abo really answer Q. OK. people” —- Bottom line, that questi Ub on. "Nobody could predict grooming out of "393 undergraduate students." TI can't two different concepts. 364 Right? SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00008010