DOJ-OGR-00008048.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document507 Filed 11/24/21 Page /7 of 28 excluded. Much of it would constitute hearsay, and the small portion that may not would run afoul of other rules of evidence. A. Dr. Hall’s Opinions iT Are Irrelevant 3 The Government moves to redact portions of this brief and seal Exhibit B, which is Dr. Hall’s evaluation of Minor Victim-4, in accordance with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this brief and the attached exhibit are judicial documents subject to the common law presumption of access, because this brief discusses a psychiatric evaluation of Minor Victim-4 contained in Exhibit B, consisting throughout of , these redactions and sealing requests are narrowly tailored to protect her privacy interest. 2 DOJ-OGR-00008048