EFTA00208570.pdf

From: Paul Cassell <cassellp@law.utah.edu> To Villafana(%.usdoj.gov>, Cc 'Brad Edwards (brad@pathtojustice.com)" <brad@pathtojustice.com> Subject: RE:MTD in the Eleventh Circuit Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 18:21:18 +0000 Importance: Normal Brad and I are preparing to file today in the Eleventh Circuit a motion to dismiss Epstein's frivolous interlocutory appeal, for reasons outline in our opposition to his motion to stay. What is your position on this motion? We understand you are conferring with Washington DO), and hope that they will agree that expansion of the Perlman doctrine is clearly not in the Government's interest. Thanks for providing us whatever information you can as soon as you can. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.). Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 2:37 PM ofainslibminliallilSolirad Edwards (brad@pathtojustice.com); Paul Cassell Subject: Proposed Order, Jane Does I United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so much. EFTA00208570