EFTA00209296.pdf

From: (USAFLS)" To: "a i Fli,S " (USAFLS)" Subject: FW: (1) any more production; (2) materials Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 16:07:02 +0000 Importance: Normal Marie, I'm going to tell Paul that we have not produced all the correspondence. First, I will be sending them materials from CEOS. Second, there may be materials from the DAG's Office. Third, you have some documents you are currently reviewing. As tom do we have a position on 302's and other documents related to her? Thanks. From: Paul Cassell [mailto Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:45 AM To: (USAFLS); Brad Edwards ( Subject: RE: (1) any more production; (2) materials Dear We are writing for two reasons. First, we would like to confirm that you have produced all the correspondence that we have requested — that you're not contemplating any more production. Second, we now represent in her capacity as a crime victim. As such, we are requesting her 302's and all other information you have gathered with respect to her. Thanks for your help on this. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, and Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law I tp://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell Paul You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Paul Cassell Sent: Monda May 05, 2014 8:22 AM To: (USAFLS); Brad Edwards ( Subject: RE: Jane Does No. 1 and 21 United States - Production of Documents - is one missing? EFTA00209296 Hi Brad and I wanted to thank you for producing the correspondence last Friday. We're sure that was a lot of work, and we appreciate you getting that to us in a timely fashion. Brad and I wanted to double check with you. The first file that we received was identified as RFP_2. We never received an RFP_1. In total we received eight files, as the title of your email suggested we would. The eight were: RFP_2 RFP_3_part_I RFP_3_part_II RFP_3_part_III RFP_5_Redacted RFP_8 RFP_19 RFP_mis Should we have received anything else? Specifically, should we have received an RFP_1? Thanks you in advance for darifying this point. Brad and I are working on a filing in response to the Epstein Motion for Protective Order that we may need to file in the next 24 hours, so we'd appreciate clarity on this point soon. Thanks again for all your help. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law (801) 581-6897 (fax) You can access my publications on http://ssm.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 1:35 PM To: Paul Cassell; Brad Edwards ( Subject: Jane Does No. 1 and 2 United States - Production of Documents, One of Eight Paul and Brad, I will be sending you eight (8) files, broken into several e-mails. I have not gone through the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) files, although I have included the May 15, 2008 letter from the CEOS Chief advising Epstein's attorneys that the United States Attorney was acting within his discretion in prosecuting the case. On the documents pertaining to Epstein's appeal to the Deputy Attorney General's Office, the documents produced are copies provided to our Office. There may be more at the Deputy Attorney General's Office, which has been notified of the Eleventh Circuit's decision. EFTA00209297