Back to Results

EFTA00211084.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS9  •  Size: 122.3 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
PDF Source (No Download)

Extracted Text (OCR)

From: ' (USAFLS)" ctl To: Paul "Brad Edwards ( Cc: "la i Ii,S"‹ (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Status of E-mail Review Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:31:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul and Brad, My apologies for a delayed response, I was on travel to Columbia SC on February 23-24, 2017. The FBI identified two e-mail systems used by its employees: (1) the Unclassified Net (UNET), which is used to send and/or receive e-mails from outside the FBI. This would include emails from other DOJ components, other federal agencies, and other federal and/or state law enforcement agencies; and (2) the FBI Net (FBINET), which is used by FBI employees to communicate internally. The FBINET is secure and is capable of transmitting classified information. I was told that, since we were searching for older e-mails, they would not exist if the e-mail had been "double deleted," e.g., deleted from the e-mail inbox, and then deleted from the deleted items box. Also, e-mails on the FBINET were not regularly backed up until after the period specified for our search, 2006 - 2008. I asked the FBI to conduct a search of the e-mail accounts of Special Agents and the co-case agents in the Epstein criminal investigation. The search was to cover the period January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008. I provided the FBI Information Technology section a copy of petitioners' Supplemental Request for Production to The Government Regarding Evidence of Government's Violations of Victim's Rights, dated August 25, 2016 (transmitted on August 29, 2016). I asked the FBI to design a search which would cover responsive e-mails, and told them I wanted a broad search. The FBI search yielded 246 emails on the UNET, and 1,908 on the FBINET, for Agents and email accounts. On January 18-19, 2017, and February 8, 2017, I went to the FBI Miami field office and reviewed the emails retrieved by the FBI. None of the e-mails I reviewed were responsive to Supplemental Discovery Requests 1 through 8. Specifically, I looked for e-mails expressing concern about individuals in the U.S. Attorney's Office having business, social, or other relationships with Epstein (Supp. Disc. Request No. 1), and the possible offer of future employment or client business by Epstein to members of the U.S. Attorney's Office (Supp. Dis. Request No. 2). I found none. As to Supplemental Discovery Request No. 3, there were e-mails "regarding the prosecution of the Epstein case," but none I found that pertained to prosecutors obtaining benefits from Epstein. If you have any questions, please call me at . Thank you for your courtesy in granting us additional time. From: Paul Cassell Imailto: Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 12:22 PM To: (USAFLS) < >; Brad Edwards EFTA00211084 Cc: .(USAFLS) Subject: RE: Status of E-mail Review (USAFLS) Brad and I just wanted to touch base with you on the status of this email review. We were under the impression that you would be providing something for us on Friday, per email below. Just wanted to see how things are coming along. Thanks in advance for any information you can provide. Paul Cassell for Jane Doe 1, 2, 3 and 4 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law and University Distinguished Professor of Law You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. From: (USAFLS) [mailto. Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 11:21 AM To: Brad Edwards Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Status of E-mail Review Brad and Paul, ; Paul Cassell (USAFLS) A belated Happy New Year to both of you. During the week of January 17, 2017, I reviewed approximately 1800 emails at the FBI field office in Miramar, Florida. Due to an inspection being conducted by FBI Headquarters of the Miami office, I had to vacate the office I was using. I should be able to continue my review within the next two weeks. May we have an extension until February 24, 2017? Thanks. EFTA00211085

Document Preview

PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.

Document Details

Filename EFTA00211084.pdf
File Size 122.3 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 4,421 characters
Indexed 2026-02-11T11:15:14.163761
Ask the Files