Back to Results

EFTA00211129.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS9  •  Size: 101.1 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
PDF Source (No Download)

Extracted Text (OCR)

From: Paul Cassell <cassellp@law.utah.edu> To Cc Subject: RE: Rescheduling Settlement Conference - bad date Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:54:12 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png I'm wonder if you could work with us on one thing -- both sides gave Judge Brannon a list of dates that would work, but he picked another date -- July 5. That date is awkward for me, because it would require me to rearrange long established family plans and travel on the the evening of the 4th of July. Would you be able to ask him for another date? I think Brad gave you bunch of dates that work for us -- and, I think, for you. Thanks in advance for any help you can extend. Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law and University Distinguished Professor of Law You can access my publications on http://ssm.corn/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. sent: u Junes „1 zu Ib . To: Brad Edwards; Paul Cassell uj : : t<escneauling settlement on erence That is fine with me. Or if you want to keep the current date for now and see where we are next week, that is fine with me, as well. From: Brad Edwards [mailto:brad@pathtojustice.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 12:28 PM To: (USAFLS); Paul Cassell EFTA00211129 Apparently those dates don't work for Jay Howell. Orchestrating around this many schedules is difficult. Not impossible but maybe not necessary. By that I mean does it make more sense to inform Judge Brannon that we are communicating with one another to see if a resolution is possible without the need for mediator input? If there comes a point where we think the mediator could help then we can approach him then. In the meantime, we can continue discussions and see whether we are able to reach an agreement or not. Just an idea. Let me know what you think. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Ft Lehrman, P.L. Brad Edwards Board Certified Trial Attorney Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 11:56 AM To: Paul Cassell <cassellp_@law.utah.edu> Cc: Brad Edwards <brad@pathtojustice.com>. Lee Dexter (USAFLS) < Hi Paul and Brad — We are available on July 21' and July 22nd. Judge Brannon is on duty the weeks of July 25th and August P', and I recall from our last session that he does not schedule settlement conferences while he is on duty. We, of course, do not oppose a motion to reschedule. Please let me know if you need anything from me. s, EFTA00211130

Document Preview

PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.

Document Details

Filename EFTA00211129.pdf
File Size 101.1 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,935 characters
Indexed 2026-02-11T11:15:15.062171
Ask the Files