EFTA00211129.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From: Paul Cassell <cassellp@law.utah.edu>
To
Cc
Subject: RE: Rescheduling Settlement Conference - bad date
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:54:12 +0000
Importance: Normal
Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png
I'm wonder if you could work with us on one thing -- both sides gave Judge Brannon a list of dates that would work, but
he picked another date -- July 5. That date is awkward for me, because it would require me to rearrange long established
family plans and travel on the the evening of the 4th of July.
Would you be able to ask him for another date? I think Brad gave you bunch of dates that work for us -- and, I think, for
you.
Thanks in advance for any help you can extend. Paul
Paul G. Cassell
Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law
and University Distinguished Professor of Law
You can access my publications on http://ssm.corn/author=30160
CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State
Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you.
sent: u
Junes
„1
zu
Ib
.
To: Brad Edwards; Paul Cassell
uj
:
: t<escneauling settlement on erence
That is fine with me. Or if you want to keep the current date for now and see where we are next week, that is
fine with me, as well.
From: Brad Edwards [mailto:brad@pathtojustice.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 12:28 PM
To:
(USAFLS); Paul Cassell
EFTA00211129
Apparently those dates don't work for Jay Howell. Orchestrating around this many schedules is difficult. Not impossible
but maybe not necessary. By that I mean does it make more sense to inform Judge Brannon that we are communicating
with one another to see if a resolution is possible without the need for mediator input? If there comes a point where we
think the mediator could help then we can approach him then. In the meantime, we can continue discussions and see
whether we are able to reach an agreement or not.
Just an idea. Let me know what you think.
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Edwards, Fistos Ft Lehrman, P.L.
Brad Edwards
Board Certified Trial Attorney
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 11:56 AM
To: Paul Cassell <cassellp_@law.utah.edu>
Cc: Brad Edwards <brad@pathtojustice.com>. Lee Dexter (USAFLS) <
Hi Paul and Brad — We are available on July 21' and July 22nd. Judge Brannon is on duty the weeks of July 25th
and August P', and I recall from our last session that he does not schedule settlement conferences while he is on
duty.
We, of course, do not oppose a motion to reschedule. Please let me know if you need anything from me.
s,
EFTA00211130
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00211129.pdf |
| File Size | 101.1 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,935 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T11:15:15.062171 |