EFTA00211363.pdf

From: ' To: "Brad Edwards" "Paul Cassell" <1 Cc: '=11.•FIi.,S" >, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Rescheduling Settlement Conference Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:43:23 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png That is fine with me. Or if you want to keep the current date for now and see where we are next week, that is fine with me, as well. From: Brad Edwards [mailto: Sent: Tuesda June 14 2016 12:28 PM To: . USAFLS • Paul Cassell Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Rescheduling Settlement Conference Apparently those dates don't work for Jay Howell. Orchestrating around this many schedules is difficult. Not impossible but maybe not necessary. By that I mean does it make more sense to inform Judge Brannon that we are communicating with one another to see if a resolution is possible without the need for mediator input? If there comes a point where we think the mediator could help then we can approach him then. In the meantime, we can continue discussions and see whether we are able to reach an agreement or not. Just an idea. Let me know what you think. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. Brad Edwards Board Certified Trial Attorney 000000Z From: (USAFLS) Imailto: Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 11:56 AM EFTA00211363 To: Paul Cassell < Cc: Brad Edwards < >; (USAFLS) ; (USAFLS) Subject: Rescheduling Settlement Conference Hi Paul and Brad — We are available on July 2P' and July 22id. Judge Brannon is on duty the weeks of July 25' and August P', and I recall from our last session that he does not schedule settlement conferences while he is on duty. We, of course, do not oppose a motion to reschedule. Please let me know if you need anything from me. Best regards, Marie EFTA00211364