Back to Results

EFTA00211530.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS9  •  Size: 107.4 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
PDF Source (No Download)

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 387 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08.80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE NO. 2'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO BE EXCUSED FROM UPCOMING MEDIATION SESSION COMES NOW Jane Doe No. 2, by and through undersigned counsel, to request that she be excused from the upcoming court-ordered mediation session in this case. Jane Doe 2 is aware that, ordinarily, the personal attendance of all parties to a case is required. The obvious purpose of that requirement is to insure that, if possible, the mediation is successful. In this case, Jane Doe 2 has agreed that, if a mediated resolution is reached with Jane Doe 1, that resolution will be acceptable to her as well. She will also be available by telephone should any unanticipated need arise. Accordingly, her personal attendance at the mediation will not be required to produce a successful mediation and she should not be required to personally attend. The Government does not oppose the motion provided that Doe 2 has authorized Jane Doe 1 to act on her behalf and had agreed to abide by the decisions made by Jane Doe 1 at the mediation and has signed something to that effect. Counsel anticipate being able to secure such a written statement and will advise the Court and Government counsel if for any reason that does not occur. WHEREFORE, Jane Doe 2 asks to be excused from personal attendance requirement of the pending mediation. 1 EFTA00211530 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 387 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 2 of 3 DATED: April 22, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Jane Does No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 • This daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the University of Utah 2 EFTA00211531 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 387 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that the foregoing document was served on April 22, 2016, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Attorneys for the Government Roy Eric Black Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 3 EFTA00211532

Document Preview

PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.

Document Details

Filename EFTA00211530.pdf
File Size 107.4 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,475 characters
Indexed 2026-02-11T11:15:20.196623
Ask the Files