EFTA00212399.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From: iii
m i (USAFLS)"
—
=
=RECIPIENTS/CND
To: '
(USAFLS)"
>
Subject: RE: Avoiding an Unnecessary Fight
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:32:57 +0000
Importance: Normal
DearMind
I am out of the District until Thursday and I have not heard from
this week (he is out of the District as
well, I believe). I know that last week he received some guidance from our Office, with a request that he gather
additional information from DC. I don't know whether he was able to get that additional information.
I know that you have been very patient, and I hate to ask you to wait a little longer. I am back in West Palm
Beach on Thursday, but I am trying to finalize a plea to mandatory life in a double-homicide case that I am trying
to schedule for Friday. If you can wait until Tuesday (because Monday is a holiday), you will have my
undivided attention, and I can follow-up with DC or Miami or whomever else needs to be consulted to get a final
answer.
If I hear anything fromMin the meantime, I will let you know.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
From:
Sent: li
a February 15, 2011 10:26 AM
To:
USAFLS ;
Cc:
(USAFLS)
Subject: RE: Avoiding an Unnecessary Fight
Dear
=and I look forward to hearing from you today (as you Indicated that you would) about our proposal that the U.S.
Attorney's Office will simple stand on the sidelines and not oppose our efforts to set aside the plea. I would hope that you
would reiterate to the U.S. Attorney and the First Assistant, once again, how much we would like to avoid fighting
with your Office so that we can focus our energies on Epstein the sex offender. We don't understand why the U.S.
Attorney's Office feels that it needs to join this fight with the victims -- we hope that you will work to find a way to make
this happen and avoid and entirely unnecessary clash between prosecutors and crime victims.
We are happy to discuss with you ways to minimize any clash and any logistics that would be involved -- if we have
agreement in prindple on the concept. We are also available for a conference call today after 5:00 Florida time, if you
would like further discussions.
Sincerely,
co-counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2
EFTA00212399
Fax:
Emai
CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only
for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended
recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error,
please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you.
From:
(USAFLS) [mailb —
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 9:03 AM
To
Cc:
USAFLS)
Subject: Request for Investigation Of Jeffrey Epstein Prosecution
and Faa.
We enjoyed meeting in person with you and
last Friday. I wanted to update you on the matters we
discussed that day.
First,
request for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution has been referred to the Department
of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility. OPR is the component within the DOJ which investigates
allegations of misconduct relating to the authority of DOJ attorneys to investigate, litigate, and give legal
advice. The December 10, 2010 letter asks this office "to investigate through appropriate and independent
channels the handling of the Epstein (non)prosecution."
OPR is the appropriate and independent body
within the DOJ to investigate and determine whether misconduct has occurred.
Second, during the meeting on December 10, we advised you of the ethical standards applicable regarding a
potential prosecution of Epstein by our office, and that a recusal would likely ensue.
Given your request for
an investigation of this Office's conduct in the Jeffrey Epstein case, and the referral of that request to OPR, we
are seeking guidance from Dal on whether this office can continue to defend the Crime Victim Rights Act case.
Third, we discussed the sequence in the litigation. You asked us that, in the event the court decides that the
CVRA applied, in the absence of a formal charge, that the government concede (1) the U.S. Attorney's Office
failed to comply with the CVRA; and (2) the district court should set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
In light of what has occurred, we cannot give you an answer on those two points.
You had told us earlier that you would be filing a dispositive motion by December 17, 2010. I expect to find
out whether our office needs to recuse itself within the next week.
I will be on leave from December 17-28,
but will be back at the office on December 29. I am asking if you would defer filing any motion until after I
return on December 29.
Thank you.
I can be reached by e-mail and cell phone,
during my annual leave.
EFTA00212400
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00212399.pdf |
| File Size | 142.8 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 4,895 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T11:15:31.518175 |