EFTA00212781.pdf

Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 3 JANE DOE, ) Case No. ) 08-80736-CIV-MARRA 4 Petitioner, ) 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,) ) 7 Respondent. ) West Palm Beach, Florida ) August 14, 2008 8 ) 9 10 TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENNETH A. MARRA 12 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 11 13 14 Appearances: 15 FOR THE PETITIONER Bradley J. Edwards, ESQ., and Paul G. Cassell, ESQ. 16 17 FOR THE RESPONDENT AUSA, and 18 19 Reporter Stephen W. Franklin, RMR, CRR, CPE 20 MIIIIIMIll 21 22 23 24 25 Official Court Reporter AUSA EFTA00212781 Page 2 1 (Call to the order of the Court.) 2 THE COURT: Good afternoon. 3 VOICES: Good afternoon, Your Honor. 4 THE COURT: All right. This is the case of In Re: 5 Jane Does 1 and 2, case number 08-80736-C/V-MARRA. 6 May I have counsel state appearances, please, and 7 if you can please try and speak up so we can hear you. 8 MR. EDWARDS: Okay. Brad Edwards, on behalf of 9 Jane Doe 1 and 2. 10 MR. CASSELL: Paul Cassell, along with Mr. Edwards. 11 THE COURT: Good afternoon. 12 MR. LEE: Good afternoon, Your Honor. For the 13 United States Government, Assistant U.S. 14 Attorney, and 15 THE COURT: All right. Good afternoon. 16 Mr. -- everyone, we're having trouble hearing you, 17 so if you can try and speak up, and also if you could 18 identify yourself before you begin speaking so the reporter 19 can accurately indicate on the record who is speaking. / 20 appreciate that. 21 / scheduled this for a status conference in order 22 to determine whether I'm going to need additional -- as far 23 as the parties were concerned, whether either of the parties 24 thought that I needed additional information in order to 25 proceed with the pending motion by the Plaintiffs or whether EFTA00212782 Page 3 1 we have a complete record based upon what's already been 2 submitted, and I wasn't quite sure where we were on that 3 since we last met. 4 So if I can hear from Mr. Edwards or Mr. Cassell 5 first what the Plaintiffs' position as far as where we stand 6 on the record in terms of whether I need additional facts, 7 evidence, or there's going to be a stipulation submitted to B me upon which I can rely. 9 MR. EDWARDS: Sure. 10 Your Honor, this is Brad Edwards. 11 / believe that you do have a sufficient record, in 12 that / don't think that -- I think that we're in agreement 13 that additional evidence does not need to be taken in the 14 case for Your Honor to make a ruling. We have actually met 15 with the U.S. Attorney, and we've had meaningful discussions 16 in an attempt to resolve our issues. I think the only issue, 17 we can probably agree to this right now, is that the victims 18 are unable at this point in time to go any further with 19 requesting a remedy from the Court without the full and 20 complete plea agreement being produced to us from the U.S. 21 Government, and the U.S. Government's hands are tied in that 22 there's a confidentiality agreement within that plea 23 agreement that prohibits them from turning that over. 24 So at this point in time, we would be asking Your 25 Honor to enter an order compelling them to turn over that EFTA00212783 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 4 agreement, and at that point in time I think we can meet again and probably resolve our disputes amongst ourselves. THE COURT: All right. So do I understand that you're modifying your claim for relief at this point and only seeking me to compel the Government to produce the plea agreement, or are you -- or is this a -- a preliminary step, after which you're then going to evaluate whether you want me to do something further? MR. EDWARDS: I think it's the latter, Your Honor. /t is, and it will likely always be, our position that the victims' rights are violated. However, because of the legal consequences of invalidating the current agreement, it is likely not in my clients' best interest to ask for the relief that we initially asked for. So in order to effectively evaluate the situation and ask for the appropriate relief, we would just be asking Your Honor at this point in time to allow us to see the full entire plea agreement that is purportedly drafted to protect my victims. That only seems fair to know, you know, what the plea agreement says, especially in light of the fact that Mr. Epstein knows what the plea agreement says. relief, whether THE COURT: All you will evaluate to either dismiss some additional relief? right. And then if I grant that the agreement and then decide your case or go forward and ask for EFTA00212784 Page 5 1 MR. EDWARDS: That's correct, Your Honor. 2 THE COURT: /s it your plan or is there any kind 3 of -- been any kind of discussion between you and the 4 Government as to what you -- if I grant the relief of 5 requiring the Government to at least present you with the 6 agreement and let you view it, has there been any discussion 7 about you keeping it confidential and not letting it go any 8 further than your clients and using it for your 9 decision-making purposes, or do you wish to have it released 10 to you, and you would be able to use it however you wished? 11 MR. EDWARDS: Well, Your Honor, we would prefer 12 that it be produced to us and not have to keep it 13 confidential. I think that that creates an undue hardship on 14 us. However, if it was Your Honor's order that we do 15 maintain some confidentiality of the agreement, we would 16 certainly abide by it. 17 The reason we want it is not so that it's 18 disseminated everywhere; however, there is a public interest 19 in viewing what happens in the court process, and this is 20 just part of it. There's no reason that it should be sealed 21 or kept confidential. Seems to be an overwhelming reason 22 to -- to make it public. However, that's not our intention. 23 Our intention is just to view it, represent my clients and 24 then evaluate it and ask the Court for the appropriate relief 25 after we've seen it. EFTA00212785 Page 6 1 THE COURT: All right. And, again, although I hear 2 you saying you think that it shouldn't be kept confidential 3 because there's some public interest in it, but if you had it 4 to use for whatever, to represent your client either in 5 advising your clients whether to go forward with this case or 6 not, or I guess to use it in connection with any other 7 litigation that you might want to initiate on behalf of your 8 clients where that agreement might have some relevance, 9 what's the interest in using -- having the ability to 10 disclose it beyond those purposes? 11 MR. EDWARDS: Well, certainly if -- if the 12 agreement was designed to protect these victims in a criminal 13 as well as a civil context, and we are going to be filing 14 civil cases against Mr. Epstein, and this agreement, 15 undoubtedly it will play a big role in the amount of 16 protection the victims have been allotted, as well as the 17 course of action in the civil cases. It seems inevitable 18 that it's going to become, you know, more public at that 19 point in time, and I think that's in the very near future. 20 At this point in time, it's not intention to make 21 it public, but I think that inevitably happens as soon as 22 civil litigation begins, and this is at the heart of it, 23 24 THE COURT: Well, civil litigation has already 25 begun, hasn't it? EFTA00212786 Page 7 1 MR. EDWARDS: Right. 2 THE COURT: Okay. All right. 3 MR. EDWARDS: At least for some other parties, with 4 other attorneys and other things, so . . . 5 THE COURT: Well, you filed a case yesterday, 6 didn't you? 7 MR. EDWARDS: We filed one of them. It is not on 8 behalf of one of the Jane Does that /'m representing in this 9 action. 10 THE COURT: Okay. All right. 11 MR. EDWARDS: Just so that we're clear. 12 THE COURT: I haven't seen the name, so I didn't 13 know who it was on behalf of. 14 All right. Let me hear from Mr. or 15 16 I understand that you're under a confidentiality 17 agreement, and / understand that you feel restricted in what 18 you can unilaterally do, but I've already entered some 19 rulings in this case that have made portions of that 20 agreement public. Is there any reason to keep the rest of 21 the agreement confidential, other than you're obligated by 22 the agreement and don't want to be in a position where you've 23 unilaterally violated it absent a court order? 24 MR. Yes, Your Honor. This is . 25 Good afternoon. EFTA00212787 Page 8 1 Your Honor, we do feel bound by the confidentiality 2 provision such that we could not voluntarily disclose this 3 non-prosecution agreement without court order compelling us 4 to do so. 5 The provision in the non-prosecution agreement 6 required us to notify Mr. Epstein and his attorneys of any 7 attempts to have this document disclosed in a public forum, B and we have done so. They have expressed their desire that 9 if this document is to be disclosed to the Petitioners in 10 this case, that it be done pursuant to a protective order 11 which would preclude the victims from disseminating it 12 publicly. 13 We believe that is appropriate in this action. It 14 would allow them access to the document, which they claim 15 they have a need to have, and that's fine. They can review 16 it and determine where they wish to go. We believe there's 17 no public interest in having this disseminated. 18 Now, should there be subsequent litigation between 19 Mr. Edwards' clients and Mr. Epstein, and the subject matter 20 of this agreement should arise, then Mr. Epstein and 21 Mr. Edwards will be in a position to litigate that in 22 whatever forum it is, rather than having that issue disposed 23 of where they're not present to voice their objections. 24 So we would ask the Court to, if it compels us to 25 disclose it, to do so under a protective order which would EFTA00212788 Page 9 1 provide for no public dissemination. 2 THE COURT: All right. 3 Your Honor this is 4 Just to add onto what was saying, one of 5 our concerns is that there are names of individuals in the 6 order who are not currently -- 7 THE COURT: Ms. I'm having trouble B hearing you. I apologize. 9 I'm sorry. 10 Your Honor, one of our concerns is that the 11 agreement contains names of individuals who are not 12 currently -- haven't pled guilty or haven't -- do not have 13 certain obligations. And / think that there may be a Rule 14 6(e) issue if the agreement is made public or available to 15 the press, et cetera. 16 THE COURT: Okay. So, I'm sorry, you say there are 17 names of other individuals that do what? 18 MS. They were other individuals who are 19 the subject of these -- who are the subject of the 20 Government's investigation but who are not necessarily known 21 to the public in the sense that Mr. Epstein entered the 22 guilty plea and the public is aware of that, but they may not 23 know about these other individuals who haven't been indicted, 24 and therefore I think they have a bit of a privacy interest 25 here. EFTA00212789 Page 10 1 THE COURT: Okay. But they're not parties to the 2 agreement. 3 MS. : No. 4 THE COURT: Okay. Other than the fact that the 5 Government bound itself in the agreement not to disclose it, 6 and you require a court order to have it disclosed, what 7 would be the public interest, or what would be the 8 justification for denying disclosure of the agreement at 9 least to purported victims of Mr. Epstein's conduct? Why 10 shouldn't the victims who the Government, as I understand it, 11 provided notice of their rights under the Act that they had 12 the status of victims, why shouldn't they have the 13 opportunity to see that agreement? 14 MS. Your Honor, I guess I will respond. 15 I was prepared to -- I need to highlight an issue 16 for the Court. I was prepared to argue today that we had 17 provided the victims with the portion of the agreement that 18 is relevant to them. 19 Last night and this morning, in conversations with 20 Mr. Epstein's attorneys, they have said for the first time 21 that they do not believe that one portion of the agreement is 22 binding, and that is the portion that has been disclosed to 23 the victims. So I can no longer say that they have the 24 portion that is relevant to them. 25 THE COURT: I'm sorry, I didn't quite follow that, EFTA00212790 Page 11 1 Ms. 2 You've had discussions with Mr. Epstein's counsel 3 as to what? 4 MS. 1111111111 Your Honor, in preparation for 5 today's hearing, I was -- I had been working to confirm with 6 Mr. Epstein's attorney that the agreement that I have 7 described in my declaration is the one that they are 8 performing under. Last night and this morning for the first 9 time, I was told that they believe that a portion of the 10 agreement that is described in my declaration and that was 11 disclosed to the victims does not bind them. So as of this 12 point, the victims have not received at least what 13 Mr. Epstein claims is the portion relevant to them. 14 THE COURT: Okay. Your understanding is that 15 Mr. Epstein's taking the position that the portions of the 16 agreement that have already been disclosed are not -- is not 17 binding on Mr. Epstein? 18 MS. Yes. 19 MR. ■: Your Honor, this is Dexter Lee. If I 20 may? 21 The agreement initially negotiated was executed in 22 September of 2007. That's part one, I will call it. 23 In October, there was an addendum to the executed 24 agreement which occurred the month before. There was some 25 more discussions, and there was a letter that was submitted EFTA00212791 Page 12 1 to Mr. Epstein's attorneys by the United States Attorney in 2 December. That's part three, I will call it. 3 There is now a dispute between the Government and 4 Mr. Epstein's attorneys about whether certain portions after 5 the original agreement are effective and binding. I just 6 need to make the Court aware of that and also Mr. Edwards and 7 Judge Cassell. 8 MR. EDWARDS: This is the first time 9 This is Brad Edwards speaking. 10 This is the first time we're hearing any of this. 11 This is obviously even further evidence that the victims were 12 unaware of the plea agreement that was being worked out. 13 But, nonetheless, I don't think that it changes our 14 position, in that we believe we're entitled to not only the 15 plea agreement, but all of the addenda that have been 16 attached to that plea agreement and have become part of that 17 plea agreement, just so that what we're asking for is clear. 18 MR. Your Honor, this is 19 We are prepared to give all three hopefully, in our 20 view, pursuant to a protective order preventing public 21 disclosure, but we just want the Court and the Petitioners' 22 counsel to know that there is a dispute ongoing right now 23 about which portions are effective and which are not. And we 24 can discuss that with them at the conclusion of the hearing. 25 THE COURT: All right. But again, as far as my EFTA00212792 Page 13 1 earlier question, even though there's a dispute now 2 apparently between Mr. Epstein and the Government as to what 3 portions of the agreement are or are not binding, does the 4 Government have any reason why the victims should not have 5 the benefit of seeing these -- the agreement, whether, you 6 know, it's going to be held binding down the road or not, 7 other than you agreed in a confidentiality order not to 8 disclose it? But beyond that, is there any justification 9 that the Government can provide to me as to why the victims, 10 people who have been identified by the Government as victims 11 of Mr. Epstein, should not have the benefit of seeing this 12 plea agreement, or non-prosecution agreement, whatever you 13 want to term it? 14 MR. Your Honor, this is When you 15 refer to victims, do you mean victims beyond the three that 16 are parties to the instant litigation? 17 THE COURT: I mean -- yes, I'm talking about anyone 18 who the Government may have disclosed as a -- as a -- or sent 19 notice to based upon your understanding of who might have 20 been a potential or an alleged victim of Mr. Epstein's 21 conduct, whether they're part of this lawsuit or not. 22 MR. Well, if the Court is asking whether we 23 could expand the protective order such that it would permit 24 disclosure to those other victims identified that have 25 received notification already, I believe that would be EFTA00212793 Page 14 1 appropriate. 2 THE COURT: Okay. But I guess my real question is 3 do you have any reason that you could advance why they should 4 not get it? 5 Let's just limit ourselves to the victims who are 6 the Jane Does in this case before we go beyond that. Is 7 there any reason that the Government can advance why the two B Jane Does 1 and 2 in this case should not have the 9 opportunity to view the plea agreement, or the deferral 10 agreement or the addenda to it? Can anyone justify not 11 letting them see it? 12 MR. Your Honor, this is 13 No, we cannot. 14 THE COURT: Okay. All right. Now, Mr. Edwards. 15 MR. EDWARDS: Yes. 16 THE COURT: Is there any reason why I shouldn't, 17 assuming I'm going to allow or require the Government to 18 produce the agreement and the addenda to your clients in this 19 case -- and we'll talk about other victims in a minute -- is 20 there any reason why, at least initially, it shouldn't be 21 subject to a protective order so that in the case, for 22 example, that you filed yesterday on behalf of an alleged 23 victim under a Jane Doe, where you specifically reference 24 this agreement in your -- in one the counts, that it 25 shouldn't remain subject to a protective order at least until EFTA00212794 Page 15 1 Mr. Epstein has the opportunity to litigate whether or not it 2 should be disclosed beyond -- beyond your clients or other 3 victims? 4 MR. EDWARDS: At this point, Your Honor, I think 5 that that would probably be fair. 6 My only real concern is that if there's an order 7 out there where anybody can access on PACER and it says, B "okay, at this point I'm ordering the Government to disclose 9 this plea agreement," I just want to make sure if anybody 10 else feels entitled to that agreement, whether it's other 11 victims, or counsel, or what have you, that they be required 12 to request it from the Government or these attorneys rather 13 than try to subpoena or request it from my office, knowing 14 that / have access to this confidential agreement. 15 Other than that, no, I don't have any other reasons 16 why that's not a reasonable order. 17 THE COURT: All right. And let's assume I think it 18 should be available to any person that the Government has 19 identified as an alleged victim of Mr. Epstein's conduct, and 20 they've sent notice of their rights under the statute as a 21 victim to this -- these individuals, and I permit disclose to 22 your clients, or anyone else who fits into the category of 23 victim as described by the Government, and require -- you 24 know, again, impose a protective order that it shouldn't go 25 to anyone beyond that until such time as, in a pending EFTA00212795 Page 16 1 lawsuit, I conclude that the protective order should be 2 lifted after Mr. Epstein has an opportunity to be heard on 3 that issue, is there anything else that you would need at 4 this point? 5 MR. EDWARDS: No, Your Honor. 6 This is Brad Edwards. 7 At this point in time that's all we're requesting. 8 THE COURT: And , if I 9 conclude that anyone that you've identified as a victim and 10 notified as a victim of their rights with respect to the 11 investigation of Mr. Epstein is entitled to view the 12 agreements, subject to a protective order until such other 13 time that / say it should be released beyond that, do you -- 14 is there any reason why I shouldn't make it available to all 15 of the people who have been identified by you as a victim? 16 MR. I M This is Your Honor. 17 The answer is no, there's no problem, with the 18 exception of the grand jury issue that my colleague, 19 Ms. mentioned earlier. I may have to defer to her 20 right now on that issue to see if that would preclude what 21 the Court is asking. 22 THE COURT: All right. Hold on one second. 23 (Brief pause in proceedings.) 24 THE COURT: Mr. Edwards, is there any reason why 25 you would need to see the names of others that the Government EFTA00212796 Page 17 1 may have been investigating that might appear -- whose names 2 might appear in these agreements? /s there any interest that 3 you would have in that or need to see that information? 4 MR. EDWARDS: Well, the primary interest would be 5 that those are obviously important witnesses for any case 6 that my clients have against Mr. Epstein, witnesses that 7 Mr. Epstein is clearly aware of, since he has access to the 8 complete full agreement, and it seems inherently unfair that 9 he would have access to the names -- to a witness list that 10 my clients would not be privy to. 11 THE COURT: Well, why wouldn't you be able to get 12 those through discovery in the civil litigation? 13 MR. EDWARDS: And that may be an appropriate time 14 to get it. But that would be my primary objection for not 15 getting the names of the victims, whether now or eventually. 16 THE COURT: No, as I understand it, this is not the 17 names of other victims, this is the names of other 18 individuals that the Government may have been investigating 19 in connection with their investigation of Mr. Epstein, and 20 they're concerned about grand jury secrecy and information 21 that may have been brought before the grand jury that should 22 not be made public at this point, as I understood the 23 Government's position. 24 Is that correct, Ms. 25 MS. Yes, Your Honor. EFTA00212797 Page 18 1 MR. EDWARDS: Well, Your Honor, as I understand 2 this -- and correct me if I'm wrong, anybody -- this 3 non-prosecution agreement provides for a dismissal or 4 immunity for other individuals, and I think these are the 5 individuals that we are talking about. But all of that is 6 inextricably intertwined within this agreement, and it is 7 this agreement in its total form that is supposed to protect 6 the victims. I think that the victims have a right to know 9 of these other individuals, who my clients were also familiar 10 with during the course of this conduct, and how it protects 11 them in this case. And I don't see why they should, once 12 again, get an incomplete version of this. Because these are 13 characters that are very intertwined with the -- the -- with 14 Mr. Epstein's conduct. This is not completely and wholly 15 indifferent or irrelevant conduct for some other people. 16 This is all part of the same conduct, and I think that's 17 probably necessary for us to evaluate the effect of this 18 agreement and whether or not we're going to continue to 19 pursue this case. 20 THE COURT: All right. So you're assuming that the 21 agreement also provides that the Government will not 22 prosecute these other individuals? That's what your 23 assumption is? 24 MR. EDWARDS: Yes, Your Honor. 25 THE COURT: Do you have any information to -- upon EFTA00212798 Page 19 1 which you make that conclusion, or is that just an 2 assumption? 3 MR. EDWARDS: That is all just, you know, the 4 discussions that we've had with various individuals, law 5 enforcement, clients, things like that. And putting it 6 together, that's what we believe is a portion of this 7 agreement. /f /'m wrong about that, one of the U.S. Attorneys on the phone can probably correct me. But that's 9 my belief. 10 THE COURT: All right. Well, assume they're just 11 mentioned in the agreement in some way. And I'm not sure how 12 or why they would be mentioned. But assume they're mentioned 13 in the agreement, but there's no agreement by the Government 14 not to prosecute them. Is there any reason for you to have 15 their names if it's other than for the purpose of finding out 16 the extent to which the Government has agreed not to 17 prosecute Mr. Epstein and other individuals? 18 MR. EDWARDS: That's a tough question for me to 19 answer without knowing in what context those individuals are 20 listed. However, I just renew my previous argument that / do 21 believe they're intertwined, and I think that, once again, if 22 we get a version of this plea agreement without the portions 23 that pertain to these other individuals, then we could 24 possibly be in the same position where we are not sure as to 25 the full extent of the protection allowed under this EFTA00212799 Page 20 1 agreement. That would be -- without knowing how they're 2 mentioned, I can't voice any other objection to not getting 3 those portions but I could certainly foresee where, you know, 4 we're not going to get out of it what we're asking. 5 THE COURT: All right. Well, again, I didn't 6 understand the Government to want to redact the entire 7 provisions that relate to these individuals. I understood B that they just wanted to redact their names. 9 Am I correct, Ms. 10 MS. Yes. 11 THE COURT: Okay. So if you were given the 12 agreement with these names redacted but you saw the context 13 in which they were listed, and then, after seeing the 14 agreement and the context in which their names were 15 mentioned, if it presented a problem to you that they were 16 being withheld, couldn't you then just, you know, file 17 another motion for disclosure of the names after you've had 18 an opportunity to, you know, evaluate whether or not there's 19 any real need for you to get these names? 20 MR. EDWARDS: Okay. We could do that at that time, 21 Your Honor. 22 THE COURT: All right. Anything else that anybody 23 wants to add to what -- our discussion? 24 MR. EDWARDS: One more thing, Your Honor. This is 25 Brad Edwards. EFTA00212800 Page 21 1 Same topic. My clients are currently in a position 2 where they may be speaking to local law enforcement regarding 3 certain issues pertaining to this case, and if we are unable 4 to have access to the other named people in this agreement, 5 it may put them at a disadvantage in terms of whether or not 6 it would be in their benefit to speak with other law 7 enforcement about this case. I mean, certainly if there's 8 individuals who have been given immunity in this agreement, 9 then it would only be to the disadvantage of my clients to 10 continue to try to pursue criminal charges. 11 So in that regard, that would be my only objection 12 to not having the names of these other individuals. 13 THE COURT: All right. Well, again, you're 14 assuming that there's some kind of immunity or deferral of 15 prosecution -- 16 MR. EDWARDS: That's correct. 17 THE COURT: -- given to people other than 18 Mr. Epstein, correct? 19 MR. EDWARDS: That's correct. 20 THE COURT: Okay. And that's something that would 21 be clear once you got the agreement and you read it, and if 22 the names were -- you know, if that was apparent in the 23 agreement, then you could come back and ask me to require the 24 disclosure of the names. 25 MR. EDWARDS: Okay. That sounds fair. EFTA00212801 Page 22 1 THE COURT: All right. Ms. 2 did you have anything else you wanted to add? 3 MS. Well, Your Honor, I guess I will 4 just tell the Court this. It does indeed contain language 5 related to that issue. So I don't know if you want to make 6 Mr. Edwards jump through that hurdle or if you want to make 7 that decision now. 8 THE COURT: All right. So you're telling me that 9 there is some language in the agreements that does obligate 10 the Government to not prosecute individuals other than 11 Mr. Epstein? 12 MS. : Correct. 13 THE COURT: All right. So if that's true, why 14 should the victims not know who those people are? 15 MS. Your Honor, I guess my concern 16 really relates to disclosure. And if your protective 17 order -- or I don't know if you need a written protective 18 order or an ore tenus order, limit Mr. Edwards to disclosing 19 it only to his clients and to his co-counsel, then I don't 20 think that we would have a basis to object. 21 THE COURT: Again, with the right for them to come 22 back and ask for the ability to disclose it beyond that 23 limited group at a later time after Mr. Epstein has an 24 opportunity to be heard? 25 MS. Right. EFTA00212802 Page 23 1 THE COURT: Again, Mr. Edwards, do you have any 2 problem with that procedure, you know, you're permitted to 3 disclose -- the names of these individuals who are also 4 getting the benefit of a non-prosecution agreement would be 5 disclosed to you under the terms of the protective order 6 without prejudice to you being able to, in any litigation 7 that ensues, seeking to disclose it beyond the limited group? 8 MR. EDWARDS: No, Your Honor, that's fine. 9 THE COURT: All right. Well, then I'm going to 10 order the Government to produce the agreement and any addenda 11 to Mr. Epstein -- Mr. Edwards in this case, and it would be 12 available also to any other individuals who have been 13 identified by the United States as victims in connection with 14 the investigation of Mr. Epstein, subject to a protective 15 order. Which, I'm going to ask the parties to try and work 16 on the language of a protective order to submit to me that 17 would prohibit disclosure to anyone other than Mr. -- to the 18 victim, or victims' counsel, without prejudice to the victims 19 seeking the ability to disclose it beyond that limited group 20 after Mr. Epstein has an opportunity to be heard on further 21 disclosure. 22 MR. EDWARDS: Okay. Thank you, Your Honor. 23 MR. This is 24 Very well, Your Honor. We appreciate your time. 25 THE COURT: All right. So is there any questions EFTA00212803 Page 24 1 about it? Is there anything unclear about what I'm ordering? 2 And I'm also -- okay. And the names of the -- 3 there will be no redaction in the agreements, but any victim 4 has to -- who gets notice of this has to agree to be bound by 5 the protective order until further order of the Court. 6 MS. Your Honor, this is 7 8 Just to be clear, we are not under an obligation to 9 advise the victims of this, but if the victim asks for a copy 10 of the document, this is the procedure that we'll follow? 11 THE COURT: Well, I'm not going to tell you whether 12 you have any obligation under the Act to disclose this or 13 not. I don't want to get into that. I don't know that you 14 do, but I don't want to say that you don't. So if you have 15 an independent obligation to disclose this to victims under 16 the Act, then -- then I'm not telling you not to do it. 17 MS. VILLAFANA: Okay. But your order isn't 18 ordering us to do it. We will have to make our evaluation. 19 THE COURT: I'm only ordering it to be available to 20 victims, and the -- and then you have to decide whether 21 you're obligated under the Act to disclose it to anyone else 22 who falls into that category. 23 MS. Okay. Thank you, Your Honor. 24 THE COURT: All right. Thank you. 25 VOICES: Thank you, Your Honor. EFTA00212804 Page 25 1 THE COURT: Have a good day. 2 (Proceedings concluded.) 3 * * * * * 4 CERTIFICATE 5 I, Stephen W. Franklin, Registered Merit Reporter, and 6 Certified Realtime Reporter, certify that the foregoing is a 7 correct transcript from the record of proceedings in the 8 above-entitled matter. 9 Dated this 20th day of AUGUST, 2008. 10 11 Stephen W. Franklin, RMR, CRR 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 EFTA00212805 Page 26 .4 ablde(1) 5:16 ability (3) 6:9 212223:19 ash 131 5:10 17:11 236 abotewnlided (1) 25:8 alarm I I) 7-23 moo (6) 8.1 15:7,6117:7.921:4 accurately 11/ 119 Act Ili 1(611 24:12.16.21 *alas1)617798A add119:4202322:2 addesda (O12:15 14:10.1823:10 ;Ands (1)1123 additional 15) 2:22,243:6.13425 *does 121 143.7 &dare 111149 Wags (1) 63 alines (61123.11.12.137:25 agn (2)11724:4 a:n*4121 13:719:16 tannest 17213:12102223 4:1.6.12.18.10.21 4:23 5:6.15 6:8.12.14 7:1.2021.226:3.5.20 9:11.14 10:25.11.13.1721 116.10.1621.24 125.12.15.16.17 13:1.5.12.12 14:9.10.18.24 15:9.10.14 11:8183.6.7.18.21 19:7.11.13.13 19:22 20:1.12.14 21:1..21.2123:4.10 agnate e(4) 16:12 17:222924:3 alkyd()) 13:2114:2215:19 121423rd (1) 6:16 allow 4:178:14 14:17 kilowatt 111 19:25 AMERICA II) 1:6 amount ill 6:15 Ann (11 1:17 answer ill 16:1719:19 anybody (4)15:1.9 18:22022 apologize (I)9:8 appntal 111 21:22 appartmly III 13:2 nano .2; 1712 appearances (2) 1:142:6 apprwitale(2) 2:2013:24 *pampas 15) 4:16 5:24i:1114:I 17:13 argue 11)10.16 amanita (II 19:20 asked (I)4:14 adds 141 3:24 4:1612:17 13:22 1621 20:4 asks (1) 249 Ansi111113 amuse (3) 15:17 19:10.12 amnia 13) 14:17 18:2021:14 assoptko 121 18:21192 attached (1) 12:16 okapi (1) 3:16 sames1611) 6:7 monk" (4) 2:143:1511:6 12:1 altoentyst17) 7:496 1020 12:1.4 15:12 19;8 Angus (2)19 25:9 AUSA 1:17.11 available (5) 9:1413:18 16:14Z:1224:19 aware (3) 9:22 12:611:7 ■ back (21 212322722 based (Z) 3:1 13:19 basin(1) 22:20 Ben 111 10.20 halos 0 6:21 begun 111 623 Inter ;Si 2 9697:8.13 14:72 belle. (I) 199 baits 09 3:118:13.16 1921 119 12:14 13:25 19:6.21 bengal (4)13:5.11 21:623:4 hat 11) 4:13 beyon1111) 6:10 132.15 14:6 15:12.2516:13 22:22 23:7.19 SU) 6:15 Nod (1) 11:11 binding (5) 102211:17 11513:3.6 hi( (1) 924 boand 131 8:1 195246 Brad (5) 24 3:10 12:9 16(620:25 Bradley111 1:15 MUNI 16:23 hawed (I) 1721 C(1) 1:17 na (3) 2:1 1 1:21 122 cant 119) 1:31.45 3:14 4:24 63 7:5.19 8:10 14:6 14:8.1921 17:518:11.19 21:3.723:11 owe 2)614.17 Ca .I(5) 1:15 2:19.103:4 12:7 tokallaY MI 15:722422 tenals(3) 9:13114213 ntrtifily1311 5:1661120:3 21:7 CERTIFICATE11) 25:4 Certlfiedll) 25:6 certify (1)11.4 Meta 111915 clustgas(1) 12:13 characka (I) 18:13 charges, (I) 21:10 civil (6) 6:13.14.17222417:12 claim 121 4:48:14 clalme 11:13 clear 1l17:11 12:1721:21 24:8 clearly (II I7:7 Clematis (1) 120 cheat 111 64 clieno 116 4:135:8.23 95.8 8:19 14:18 15:212 II 6.10 18:9 19:5 21:1.922:19 collane (I) 16:18 COM. 12)21:232221 compel O) 125 masilabli1(2) 3218:3 comp& (1) 8:24 complete 131 3:1.20 17:8 completely III 18:14 concern (2)156 12:15 concerned (2) 223 17:20 concetna (2) 95.10 conclude12) 16:19 concluded (1115:2 conclusion (2) 1224 19:1 conduct (7) 10:9 1:11 15:1918:10.14.15.16 confiner III 211 conlidential Oil 5:7.13.21627:21 15:14 conlidnianly (5) 3:225:157:16 8:1 13:7 confirm l I) 115 conataion 0166 11:1923:13 constant. 4:12 motels ilt 22:4 contrasill 9:11 coots (4)6:13 19:16 20:12.14 canny 12) 18:18 21:10 consent's111 10:19 copy (1) 24:9 corral (10) 5:1 17:24 18:219:8 20.921:161819 22 12 259 *ousel (5) 2:6 11:2 1222 15:11 23:18 coos 11) 14:24 count (2) 617 I1111) coon (68) 1:1.19 27124.11.15 3:19 4:322 52.19 5:24 6:1.24 7:25.10.122383.24 9:2.7.1610:1 104.6.1625 116212513:17.22 14:2 14:14.16 15:17 16:821.2224 17:11.16 18:20 18:151910 20.1.112121:13.17.20 22:1.4.8 211221 23:1.6.25 24:5.11.19.24 25:1 conuadall11 22:19 CPR (1) 1:19 awaits (115:13 anima1D 61221:10 ('RR (2) 1:1925:11 nom II) 4:12 currently 13) 9.6.1221:1 D Dated ill 12:9 day 12125:1.9 Dettabtall) 12:2 divide il) 42324:20 daisies III 22:7 decisismakka (I) 59 decimals (21 11:7,10 derail, 16 19 Mena (2) 14921:14 &nylon I M:4 described 1, 11:7.1015:23 designed 1116 12 &Weed; n thiamine Ill 2:226:16 Dose I 17 2:13 7:24 11:1912:18 13:14 14:12 16 1623 2? Sadists/4(2) 113.6 dints (14) 6:10 8:2.15 19513:8 15:8.211121 23 27.1924:12.15.21 dinned 01 117.9 19622 11:1 1.16 13:18 15:2 4< din/...ha(l) 22:18 discloture 01) 10 6 12:21 13:24 20172124 22:16 21 17.21 dlatatry (1) 17:12 discuss (1) 1224 Senn (315:3.620.23 ditivals; (4)3:1511:2.25 16:4 Sun 1114:24 diurnal (11 143 disin 11) 8:22 diatie (3)1273.22 13:1 divan(1) 4:2 ditornated 121 5:188:17 ditterninaiing (1) 8:11 dim-lanais 0) 9:1 DLTIRICT(3) 1:1.1.12 document In 8:7.9.1424:10 Ike (3) 1:3 23) 14:23 drafted (114:18 /art.( 1) 13:1 16:19 Ed wards 144) 1:15 2:8.8.10 3:49.10 4:95:1.11 6:11 7:13.7.11 8:19.21 12;649 14:14.15 15:4 16:5.614 17:4.13 18:124 19:3.162020.24.25 21:16.19.25 226.14 23:1.8.11.22 tetal (1)18:17 effective121 122.23 Math* (114:15 Mbar 1312:2342464 casement (3)19321:2.7 tsars II) 23:7 (Sr (11 3.25 mien (2) 7:18 9:21 Shrill 4.18204 stilled 1i 12:14 15:10 16:11 Epstein i23i 4:21 6:148,6.16.206:21 11:1337 13:2.11 15:1 162.11 11:69.19 19:172118 22:11.1313:11.1420 Efolailll (18)19920 11:2.6,15 12:141320 15:19 18:14 eautlaRI (I) 4:20 ESQ (21 1:15.15 d (119:15 !MIMI! (6) 49.15.23 5:24 18:1720:18 offilnadon (1) 24:18 asnay 11) 11:15 taint (3) 3:7.13 12:11 sane (I) 14:22 aceplem (I) 16:18 main (2) 11:21.23 spend 111 13:23 expresed111 8:8 San 121 16:0125 F (aa121 4:20 194 fern ill 3:6 fak (3) 4:19 15:5 21:25 lab 11124:22 faallar (II 18:9 fat (31122 3:5 12:25 fed(2) 71781 fat (1) 15:10 (Bern 20:16 Med 131 7:5.11422 Sag (1) 6:13 (SO) 19:15 In 12) 8:1216 &M45) 3:5102011:8 12:8.10 1114(1) 15:22 5151.131 1:11.20 ISw(2) 10:25 24:10 1444PIS 111154 fasell) 20:3 fons11) 18:7 fauna) 8:7.22 fawned (2) 4:246:5 Franklb(3) 1:1925:5.11 N1(4)1194:17 17:81925 SST (6) 3:184:85:8 12:11 23:2021:5 Mare 111619 G (II 1:15 SSC (3) 17:15202237 0. 4(1) 12:19 SDP (3) 20:1121:8.17 P (71 3:144245:7 656:1614:6 15:24 0•4(121 2:213:7496:13.18 13:6 14:17 18:11 20:4 23:9.15 24:11 pod(?) 2:2.3.11.12.15 7:25 23:1 Government1271 2:13 3214:5 5:4.5103.10 12 3 13:2.4.9.10.16 149.17 15:8.11.18.23 1625 17:18 18721 19713.16206 22;10 23:10 Covenantees (3) 3219:20 17:23 Brad (3) 16:18 17:20.21 Bas (2) 4:22 5:4 grasp (3)112323:7.19 guest 11 6:6 10:14 14:2113.15 DSO (2) 9:12.22 Itandit(1) 3:21 loppow12) 5:196:21 barchalp11) 5:13 hear (4) 213:46(17:14 heard LI, 16:2222423:20 twang 161 1:10 2:16 9:811:512:10.24 bean 1l1613 ltdd (11 13:6 hi6l$16$1 (I) 10.15 !kid (1) 1622 Horns 135123.123:10.142549.17 3:1.11 19:3.10 10:14 114.19 12:18 13:14 11 I: 334 16:5.16 17:23 18:224 20:21.24 22 4 21322.24246.23.25 114)NORABLE(1) 1:11 lionur's II) 5:14 bond* (II 12:19 hurdle ill 22.6 1 Idendfled (6)13:10.24 15:16 1619.15 21.1) klentlfy 111 2:18 kanotadty 18:4218.14 Important (1117:5 Sys (1) 1514 raampletell) 18:12 Sependad II) 24:15 indicate II) 2:19 batted (I 1 923 indifferest 11) 18:15 indlaldaali (21) 93.11.17.18.23 15:1117 Is I . 1.5.9.22194.17.19.23 20921:8.12 22 211.12 mailable ili 617 inevilably 111621 iestricably 11)18:6 Olsson 1) 124 17:3.20 18:15 inberend) (I) 17:8 InItink.(3) 4:14 11:21 1420 InItiate(1) 6:7 Stant (I) 13:16 alpaca(3) 5:22.236:20 initrVA (9) 4:135:186:3.98:179:24 111:7 ' kutriained (3)196.13 19:21 knalidaRMI(1) 4:12 a) 11:138 inownsatka (4)92016:11 17:1923:14 Wrelast ill 18:15 taut 181 3:168229:14 10:15 163.1820 22 • blurt12) 3:1621:3 .1 Jill 1:15 Jane 17) 1:3 2:5.97:8144.823 Judge (21 1:12 12:7 Pop ill 22:6 Pry 131 16:18 17:20.21 lwalfleadon(2) 10:8 i1 lost) (1) 14:10 K 14,71(2) 512 7:20 kang (I) 5:7 KENKET11(1) 1:11 kepi (2) 5:21 672 Lad 11 5:2-3 21:II know (19) 4:19.196:18 7:13 923 12:22 13 e 1324 18:8 19:3 201.16.1821:22 215.34 21224:13 k994108113) 15:1319:1921:1 known (I) 9:20 Isows (I) 421 L lannallte (3) 22;4.923:16 ha (3) 194 21:2.6 laanalt111 13:21161 1:17112.137:14.24.2494 11:19.19 12181813:14.14.2114:121216:8.1616 . 2323.23 kcal (I/ 4:11 ktier1I) 11:25 $Iling ID 5:714:11 let's 2)14515:17 MI5 (11 162 bail III 4:20 boil (2)145 22:18 boiled (3) 2223 23:7.19 InI111 In Filed12) 19:202013 Ionia (2)8721 15:1 Mists (7) 6:722.24 8:18 13:16 17:12 2? 6 kcal (11212 gager (I) 1012 hl 5:15 172:1443246 111 walla()) 8:19 25:8 menu (3)13:15.1721:7 arstailialeil(1) 3:15 otet III 4:1 antlosed 161 1616 19:11.12.12202.15 EFTA00212806 Page 27 Merl (I) 753 n91(2)3:3.14 ølalle/1) 14:19 modlIblos(1) 44 moe" (1)11:21 o»91•0 (2) 1019 11 R 19°009 ø) 2:25 20 17 N name(I) 7:12 name111) 21:4 nae09110)93.11.11 162311:1.9.15.17.17 19:13 201.12.14.1719 21:122224 23:124:2 near (II 6:19 nneuar11/11) 9:20 nnemary (1)111:11 ii‘e4 1111 2:22 39.138:15 1915129 16:3.25 173291922:17 ne/di4 2:24 nepoliaied II) 11:21 nleb(vl 10.1911:8 noo.prowtistke (5)13.5 1 3:12 18:3 234 nal« (4) 10.I1 13:1915:20401 no(111941.41 13:25 nwifiN ill 16:10 limit, Ill 8:6 nemba II) 2:5 bjc•111) 22:20 bjeedos13) 11:14 20:2 21:11 Ilke0arl21 R8 bEt4te III 219 b894ted (2) 721 24:21 194:241« (3) 24:8.12.15 1414:411~111 9:13 luke* 12112:11 17:5 499944 11111:4 «oh« fl) 11:21 *Ilke (1) 15:13 Illdål(1)119 okay Ill) 281:2.10 916 10:14 11:14 14:2.14 158 2011.1/21:20.25 23:22 24:2.1723 °me13)1811 19:21 21:21 4414444811/ 1122 0999140115 171 10:13 149 15:1 16:220182124 23:20 otter<32) 2:1.21.243:154:15 5:147:21113.10.23 9:6 10611'11 13:7.21 14:21.25196.16.24 16:1.12 22:1718.18215.10.13.16 24:5.5.17 4141/188(4) 15:84:1.1619 ore 11122:18 0112914(I) 123 tnerabdiellif13) 5:21 P PACER (II 15:7 Na (2)14.20 putl (6) 3:911:21 1111613:2I 18:16 pants (61223231:1 MI 13:1623:15 PwI(2) 1:132:10 parsell) 1623 pv8418812) 2:25 15:25 pe094/ 141 13:10 i&1518:15 21:9177214 red:miming1i) 11:8 penall 13:11 15:21 penallied11) 23:2 perwm 111 15:18 pertalo ( 19:11 K 11416186 (1) 213 Petitioner(2) 14.15 Pelitione.912) 8:9 12:21 pbone 111 19:8 PhinIIITR12) 2:25 3:5 pta 111 5:2 PLI (I) 6:15 phi 11513:202243.18.9.21 92212:12.15.16 12:17 13:12 14:9 15:9 19:22 ~12) 2:6.7 914(1)912 pole' 11313:1824 4:1.4.176:19.20 11:12 15:4.8 16:4.7 17:22 94111141 (7/ 10:17.21.22.24 11:9.13 196 pallem (71 7:19 11:15 12:4.23133 19:22 20:2 poallee 191 3:5 4:10 1:228:21 11:15 12:1417:21 19:24 2 I:I 191113)hr (1119.4 poiadial 11113:9 predutk (2)8:11 16:20 petIerIll 5:11 pre)tidlte U1136.18 prelkolaary 111 44 prepatution (I) 114 propus 13110161612:19 preseni (2I 5 5623 prewnud ill 2015 pr", til 9 IS ;uti:teiing111 12 20 ~laus (11 19:20 prImary (2) 174.14 prhaty 111 924 pdp (11 17:10 pntabl, (5) 3 174:2 15:518:1719:8 pnbltal 131 16 17 20:1523:2 pn9edure ill 232 24:10 pokeed (I) 225 pnwec41084 13)1921252.1 K(9,954(1)5:19 pmdoct (3) 4:5 14:18 23:10 pmdaced 121 3:20 3:12 prnbIbIl (I) 23:11 pnehibi(811) 3:23 pon.emie 141 18:2219:14.17 22:10 pone04 lien (I) 2):I5 pneuvi t3I 4 6:121b:7 prnallon (2) 6:16 19:25 pniceilvt (13) 8:10.25 1120 1323 14:21.25 15 24 16:1.12 22:16.17 233.14.1624:5 prntais 11) 18:10 punid412) 9:1 13:9 pnvidal (2) 1911.17 pfluides12) 18:3.21 pnwiåoo (2) 82.5 pnulgeru (I) 203 publIc<13) 5:1/12.1 631821 1:20 8:7.1791.14 9 2122 10:7 12:20 17:22 put414 III 8:12 porporie4 (1)109 porpor19113 (I) 4:18 Purp(ne 111 19:15 porp999(2) 5:96:10 punment <2) 8:1012:20 punaae121 18:1921:10 9(0'1)21:5 puulog (I) 193 Q querlion (3) 13:1 14:219 I , quemions(I) 23:25 ynke 121 3:2 10.25 R rt44111 21:21 real (3) 1215:62019 red> (1) 22:16 Realia* 111 25:6 ream•1121 5:17.20.21 7.20 i 3 4 i 4 ‘.7.u. 16:1424 19:14 reasonble II) 15:16 mases 11) 15:15 rtiel,ed 12) 11:12 13:25 rtc0r4 15) 2:193:1.6.11 25:7 0064(1 121964 retbefrd 111912 rectueloo 24:2 rette ill 13:15 eketecell) 14:23 nµaed II) 21:11 mm419811) 21:2 Rezkiered11) 25:5 ftlatell) 20:7 ttluted (11215 tekaits(1) 22:16 rele/ned12) 5:91&13 relevaate(1) 6:8 rtIrwael (3) 10182411:13 lekt(?) 4:413.1623255:4.24 reb (I) 3:8 emahe II) 14:25 teniedy 1113:19 temt, 111 1920 ep:ette iSi 1:19.19 2:18 25:5.6 reprisetm (2) 3:23 6:4 repnweiing (11 71) recp991 12) 15:12.13 1/ 11/914S8 (2) 3:19 16:7 rewire (4) 109 14:17 15:232123 reqvIred ai 8:6 15:11 19991414811) 5:5 resobe 121 3:1642 res/e9111) 16:10 rtspon4 II) 10:14 R19119.014•1(2) 1:7.17 n411/7:20 resiricial (I) 7:17 te%149(111111:15 dat (3112:4.153:17 4:3226:11:1110.192 111233 14:14 15:1/ 16:1022 18:8.919:10 10 5.12 21:11 25:13.1321.25 239.25 212A riens (4)4:11 10:11 15:916:10 RAIR12) 1:19 25:11 mod (1)13:6 rek (1)615 kuk (1)9:13 n1181113:14 ndlepi(11 7 19 449 Hi 2912 mylne al 6294 mp9 I314:1021 15:1 ~led 1112:21 reard II) 5:20 socoad II) 1622 socney 11) 17:20 • P)4: I710:13 14:11 16202517:3 18:11 Attlag131 13:5.1120:13 mekka [31 4:523:1.19 ~8(2) 3:25 7:12 ~90)9:21 ~i ai 13:1813:20 5‘999nber11) 11:22 situalloa III1 4:15 800n (1)621 sorry 131 9:9.16 1025 sowds(11) 21:25 SOUTHERNII) 1:1 speak (3) 21.1121:6 %peaklog hl/ 118.19 12:9 21:2 881917.9407 (I) 1423 riand(1) 3:5 sla(e Ill 2:6 51.41(415) 1:1,62:13 12:123:13 riale. (2i 2:21 10:12 ~ete III 1520 Atep III 4.6 Stepben(3) 1:19215.11 slipalion II) 3:7 Sutte ( I) 120 subjtel <b 8:199:19.19 4212516:I2 23:14 submil III 23:16 subm9(61 (31 32.1 11:25 subpoena II) 15:13 xubacquent (II 8:18 nlikkm (1) 3:11 Solic (I) 1:20 nipp pind øl 18:7 tu (5) 3 2.9 159 19:1124 i.(1,u, el) 313 bRlll 14-19 isning Ill 13:19185 tcI1(2) 22424:11 tcHing Ib 22:824:16 (oms II) 22 IS unn el) 13 13 km, i 31 3621:5 23:5 711.4614 14) 23:22 24:232425 ibier ill 2024 Iblar, (1 74193 iblak (19)J:12.12.16 4:1.93:136:2.19.21 91324 12 13 15:417 1848.16 19.21219 lb(98b1 111 2:24 ihrte(3) 122.1913:15 lied 11) 321 1Se(1713:V124 4:1176:19.20 10 20 11:9 12:8 12:10 15:2516:7.13 17:13 2920 222323:24 isdn 111 10:16 isars(1) 11:5 'Ad (1)11:9 tople111 21:1 tocal<l) losa 11) 19:18 Umistelig II) 1:I025:7 i roubk12) 2:1697 Iren (1122:13 uy [511/.1715:13 21:1021:15 uro Ill 3:25 19P01411111 3:21 i9:411) 14:1 tiaable 1.2) 3:18 21:3 4~1) 12:12 vekkar (I) 24:1 uffideMar1 014:37:16.17 10:10 17:16 18:1 20 00114n440141148121 11:1413:19 uaderweed 12) 11:22 20:7 uado•bitAly (116:15 umbe(1) 5:13 «fair (I) 17:8 9•161(eally 1217:1823 Utlitel 15) 1:1.62:13 11123:13 um 015:1064.6 US (6) I 122:13 3:15.20.21 19:1 ■ 0111 IS S vårhas III 194 mfl« (2) 28:121922 ‘14114•111) 13:20 1423 15:19.21.23 165(.10.15 23:1824:1.9 4~135) 3:17 411196:12.168AI 109.10.12 10:11.23 11:11.12 1111 134.9.10.15.15.24 145.1915:3.11 17:131718:8.8 22:14 23:13 23:18.18249,15,20 ‘iew 15/5423 12:20 14:9 1•511 5:19 2$1 1:17 214 7:15 9:3.3.7.9.18 103.14 .18 16:8.19 17:242520:9.10 22:1.3.12 22 13.2325:67.17.27 %Ida:led12) 4:11 7:23 veke gi 8:23 202 VOICES (211324:25 9.18014405 (1) 82 IV W13) 1:19 25:5.11 inffil 112) 4:7 5:17617:22 12:21 13:1315 725.624:13.14 neffitsd (2) 208 211 926011120:25 »a't 11) J:2 ny (1) 19:11 West 12) 1:7.20 uell (211:194:10 9e're 114) 2:163:127:11 12:10.14.1716 7 Is 204.4 .fle13) 3:15 3:25194 .6.41y ill 18:14 9kb 21 5:91:16 99.bed 1115:10 uithbeld (I) 20:16 .094911)179 n1(94949121 17,54 ...mi. 111 2315 »Ø 111 12-12 9.91.1¢i< I 11:5 »oaldast ill 17:11 »nuen (1) 22.11 nag 12/ 162 192 nsler419 (21751:22 48410736-CIV-111ARRA (21 13 2 1 113)2:59 14:8 1411) 1:7 2 213) 2:5.9 14:8 ~II) 73:9 240711) 11:22 11111111) 128:9 5 3.914111) 1:20 4 41711) 1:20 561)514d7681 . 610 II) 9:14 70111) 1:20 EFTA00212807