EFTA00215139.pdf

From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:15:19 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 070921_Epstein_Non-Prosecution_Agreement.pdf Hi - This is the draft I just sent to Jay. There are still some outstanding issues, but I thought that you might want to see what the most recent looks like. From: Sent: Friday. September 21 2007 1:18 PM To Cc Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys I just spoke to Jack and related our conversation. You can expect a call from him shortly. I understand the deft. gets 3 days a month gain time plus 3 additional days a month if he works. So I think that would work out to 15 months actual time served. He would then be on the bracelet, house arrest, for one year. Jack indicated that he double checked with the stockade and the registration offense won't act as a bar to Epstein doing his time at the stockade, so they intend to register concurrent with the plea of guilty. Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation. From: Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 1:10 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Hi Barry. Thanks for your time this morning. We called Jay and told him that we (you and our office) had decided what would work best and that you would contact Jack to finalize the state agreement. I am trying to finish the federal agreement. In addition to the sentence imposed, I want to put in a provision that he will actually be in jail at least a certain number of days to make sure he doesn't try to "convince" someone with the Florida prison authorities to let him out early. So, do you know how much "gain time" would Epstein earn? And do you call it "gain time" or "good time" or something else? Thank you. EFTA00215139 From Se 03 PM To: Cc: Lanna Belohlavek Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys Jack contacted me this morning, his has agreed to all the terms, including pleading to the indictment, 18 months incarceration, followed by 1 year house arrest, as a condition of 5 years probation with all the conditions set out by Lanna in her letter, plus a fund for the victims as Feds require. The sticking point is requiring a plea to a registerable offense. Jack has suggested that he would stipulate as a condition of the defendant's probation that he will waive all defects and defenses and agree to register as a sex offender if at any time during the 5 year probation the State and Feds feel that he needs to be on the register. His hope is that by meeting all obligations of the plea and living close to the vest that we will be comfortable that he does not pose a threat and need not register. If we find through his conduct or computer web site visited, etc. that he is a danger we have 5 years to require him to register. I know this was not discussed while as a party to the negotiations, so I have reached out to Mr. Acosta to bring him up to speed, but have not hea c from him yet. From: Se • mber 20, 2007 6:17 PM To Cc Subject: RE: Meeting with Epstein's attorneys I I I just left a voicemail foi but figured I would send this to you, too. Our plea negotiations are not going very well, and I have given the defense a deadline of tomorrow afternoon to provide me with a signed agreement. If we cannot reach such an agreement, then I need to indict the case on Tuesday and I will not budge from that date. During my last phone call with defense counsel, he told me that they have changed their minds again, and they only want to plead to state charges, not concurrent state and federal. I said that is fine, but we will need a signed non-prosecution agreement (between the defense and us) by tomorrow afternoon, and an agreement at least verbally worked out with your office by Monday. I just think that Mr. Epstein is having second thoughts about spending tend paying damages to the girls. I know you are out tomorrow, but if something comes up, I will cal nd e-mail you. Thanks. EFTA00215140