DOJ-OGR-00008247.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LBF3MAXC Document 529 Filed 12/08/21 Page 3 of 18 3 1 cause; three, prospective jurors that the defense but not the 2 government believes should be excused; and four, prospective 3 jurors that the government but not the defense believe should 4 be excused. 5 And so that produced, putting those together for the 6 days, we had those four lists. My chambers sent the parties, 7 just so you had an opportunity to review them before today, a 8 list of 13 additional prospective jurors that were on the 9 parties' agreed to proceed to voir dire list, that when 10 looked at, thought should be considered for excusing and I had 11 13 juror numbers on that list. 12 I understand the government didn't object to striking 13 those prospective jurors, but the defense objected to striking 14 four of them. So from my perspective, we'll keep those four on 15 the list for whom the parties agree should proceed to voir 16 dire. 17 So, subtracting those out from the ones that the Court 18 sent, we would move the following onto the agreed to not return 19 list: 23, 114, 215, 257, 338, 420, 422, 542 and 561. 20 And then also received in that letter or e-mail that 21 the defense wishes to modify its previous strikes, it indicated 22 it wanted to move three from the agreed to proceed to voir dire 23 list to the defense objects to proceeding to voir dire list. 24 One of them, by my count, was already on the agreed to 25 strike. That was number 92. So the two new ones that the SOUTH ERN D STR CT REPORT ERS, (212) 805-0300 2) DOJ-OGR-00008247