DOJ-OGR-00008340.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke} a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LBNAMAXTps on the sexual conduct between this witness and Mr. Document 536 My question is, Correct? MR. ROHRBACH: THE COURT: "solely," this is what Yes. Filed 12/10/21 if [ think I hear: tha convicted based on this witness's sexual conduct between Mr. videnc Mr. Epstein. Is tha MR. ROHRBACH: see would be a correct statement. THE COURT: MR. ROHRBACH: THE COURT: MR. ROHRBACH: THE COURT: meaning, MR. ROHRBACH: "solely" is read to modiit creates a ——- Epstein and this witn regarding the sexual conduct between t the defendan testimony rega th your That would be That would Yes. That would be t a correct statement? in, in-- be incorrect. wrong. As a Honor's point. Page 30 of 43 30 Epstein. you add t can be rding the ess, and other is witness and Yes, that law. matter of And that doesn't solely give it that see your Honor's point that if it becomes amenabl that potential meaning? government's ide ma COURT: way, that would be, MR. RO law, yes, your Honor point is that -- Fy the sexual-conduct point, to that reading. then that The And should the jury be instructed that in my mind, RBACH: reversible error. That would be an incorrect statement of SOUTH ERN D STR CT R PORT ERS, PC. (212) 805 —0300 DOJ-OGR-00008340