EFTA00222315.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2008
Pavpitok6
JANE DOE NO. 2,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey
Epstein, as follows:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FILED by VT D.C.
ELECTRONIC
ebruary 6, 2008
CLARENCE MADDOX
CLERK U.S. 01ST. CE.
S.D. OF ILA. • MIAMI
CASE NO.:
08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON
Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
1.
Jane Doe No. 2 is a citizen and resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and is sui
juris.
2.
This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the
Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon a
minor.
3.
Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York.
4.
This is an action for damages in excess of 550 million.
5.
This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds 575,000, exclusive of interest and costs;
and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
6.
This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial
HERMAN 6 MERMELSTEIN. P. A.
- 1 -
www.hermanlaw.com
off
EFTA00222315
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2008
Page 2 of 6
part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
Factual Allegations
7.
At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52
years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to
billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his
principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. Thomas and Palm Beach,
FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
8.
Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for
underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily
economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave
them money. In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then approximately 16 years old, fell into Epstein's
trap and became one of his victims.
9.
Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted
girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. Thomas.
10.
Epstein's scheme involved the use of young girls to recruit underage girls. (Upon
information and belief, the young girl who brought Jane Doe to Epstein was herself a minor victim of
Epstein, and will therefore not be named in this Complaint). Under Epstein's plan, underage girls
were recruited ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm
Beach mansion. The recruiter would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm
Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf would direct the
recruiter to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. The recruiter, upon information and
belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from western Palm Beach
HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A.
www.hermanlaw.com
- 2 -
EFTA00222316
:Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2008
Page 3 of 6
County who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally $200 to $300 per "massage"
session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if
allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
11.
Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Upon arrival at
Epstein's mansion, the underage victim would be introduced to
Epstein's assistant,
who gathered the girl's personal information, including her name and telephone number.
would then bring the girl up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table in addition
to other furnishings. There were photographs of nude women lining the stairway hall and in the
bedroom. The girl would then find herself alone in the room with Epstein, who would be wearing
only a towel. He would then remove his towel and lie naked on the massage table, and direct the girl
to remove her clothes. Epstein would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts,
including masturbation and touching the girl's vagina.
12.
Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Jane Doe was recruited to give
Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. Jane was brought to Epstein's mansion in Palm
Beach. Once at the mansion, Jane was introduced to
, who led her up the flight of stairs
to the room with the massage table. In this room, Epstein told Jane to take off her clothes and give
him a massage. Jane kept her panties and bra on and complied with Epstein's instructions. Epstein
wore only a towel around his waste. After a short period of time, Epstein removed the towel and
rolled over exposing his penis. Epstein began to masturbate and he sexually assaulted Jane.
13.
After Epstein had completed the assault, Jane was then able to get dressed, leave the
room and go back down the stairs. Jane was paid $200 by Epstein. The young girl who recruited
Jane was paid $100 by Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
HERMAN S. MERMELSTEIN, P. A.
www.hermanlaw.com
- 3 -
EFTA00222317
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2008
Page 4 of 6
14.
As a result of this encounter with Epstein, Jane experienced confusion, shame,
humiliation and embarrassment, and has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries.
COUNT I
Sexual Assault
15.
Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
16.
Epstein tortiously assaulted Jane Doe sexually. Epstein's acts were intentional,
unlawful, offensive and harmful.
17.
Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done
willfully and maliciously.
18.
This sexual assault was in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes, which
recognizes as a crime the lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane.
19.
As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will
continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and
emotional damages.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey
Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this
Court deems just and proper.
COUNT II
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
20.
Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
21.
Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
22.
Epstein's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
23.
Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had
HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A.
www.hermanlaw.com
- 4 -
EFTA00222318
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Document 1
Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2008
Page 5 of 6
reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and
damage to Jane Doe.
24.
As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane
Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey
Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this
Court deems just and proper.
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
Plaintiffs demand a jury trial in this action.
Dated: February C2008
Respectfully submitted,
HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN. P. A.
HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18205 Biscayne Blvd.
Suite 2218
Miami, Florida 33160
Tel: 305-931-2200
Fax: 305-931-
By:
Jeffrey M. Herman
jherman@,hermanlaw.com
Florida Bar No. 521647
Stuart S. Mermelstein
smermelstein@hermanlaw.com
Florida Bar No. 947245
Adam D. Horowitz
Florida Bar No. 376980
ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com
www.hermanlaw.com
- 5 -
EFTA00222319
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Docurc•Nt11:1 CQMFASKEFITSD Docket 02/06/2008
Page 6 of 6
The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing, and service of pleading or other papers as required by law,
except as provided by local rules of court. This Porn, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of
the Court for the purpose of Initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.)
1(a) PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
JANE DOE NO. 2,
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
(b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF
OUT OF STATE
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED DEFENDANT NEW YORK
(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
(c) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME. ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER)
Herman & Mermeistein, PA., 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Sults 2218, Miami,
FL 33160, (305) 931.2200
(d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH
ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)
q !ely V foul-K/9in- ) 0 4-)/71__
It. BASIS OF JURISDICTION
(PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY)
O 1. U.S. Government
Plaintiff
O 2 U.S. Government
Defendant
III)
O 3 Federal Question
(U.S. Government Not a Party)
X 4 Diversity
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties In Item
III. CITV.ENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES
(For Diversity Case Only)
PTF
DEF
Citizen of This Stale
0 1 O 1
Citizen of Another State
X2 x 2
Citizen or Subject of s Feisty, Country 0 3 03
PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX FOR PLAINTIFF
AND ONE FOR DEFENDANT
PTF
DEF
Incorporated of Principal Place of
O 4
0 4
Business in This Stale
Incorporated and Principal Place of
O 5
O 5
Business in Another State
Foreign Nation
O 6
O 6
IV. CAUSE OF ACTION
(CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE.
DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY.)
DIVERSITY ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. §1332(a) FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT
IVa. _5_ days estimated (for both aides) to try entire case
V. NATURE OF SUIT
(PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX ONLY)
A CONTRACT
A TORTS
B FORFEITURE
PENALTY
A BANKRUPTCY
A OTHER STATUS
a 110insorcs
0 12,0146.6
o 130 Sea
P
0 140,4•00460141Nnnwl
o 15*3
/4 4" "
.
4 Vienne,' 0
SONS.
o isalieloop Ad
0 Macao
of Casa0
Nene Loans Fa
Vara4)6
0 Mama
°Wawa
0 Vanes Brae
o iinvockroblies Se"
o MOAK Cana
o 050102.0 Pooluct LOS
PERSONAL INJURY
0 MANN'
0 362 Row. 01471474,6111Wpricna
0 30 Nan Paw ustay
030 0.480044 22/1.03040 LON 71'
13 320 basall Ltd & OWN,
Dam Asian Prunes
0 33o • eon fr onen. lay
Ain Prodtcl USN
0 34014iin
034$ &Y PIPSIdlidar
PERSONAL PROPERTY
0 MO Mar veva
CI 366 74obtv4.07 Roam Lute! 0 370 Cgs /NO
1310 0 a Pan
IVA
0 371 Tn. Moeda, I
ONO CM, Ponennel
Papp Dna
0 MS onzety 0,14N40
•reaci Weft
06,3 Aoraan
0 623 OWN FODS 4 ON3
0 en ON) RYAN Sans*
Cl flopirly 21 USC ON
0 630 taxa Lam
0640RRIToack
ONO AliNe MN
0 680 003470lonal
Saaapain
0 003 awe
0422 AN*01211050 al
0 423 WINN.471 OWN IN
440 SSA Nacoort4,444
410 MOWN
00 Nam as Novo
NO Conant= ',Newt I
400 DOX4U4co
470 Rama lapro32 a
Camp Orninealon
MO Saa• Swot
Oa Swam/ 0744,03446/
A PROPERTY RIGHTS
ONO C00740 744
0 PO Pant
CI 640 7,03onark
Exchaps
1175 Oatew 0~04
ZINC3410
NI Ewalt
Acis
802 Ewalt SWANN AO
tnavnital Mars
we f nay 3AP00/ 10
we
NS ridden allrfomaco An
930 appeloff se Came
Ilarapacese
ANN
0 260 Consaaway *law
Sas
ONO Oa Suan Pane
• •cell
Oidsrawy Pa Yd stoma 0100
foe Mena
B SOCIAL SECURITY
0 001 KA 0305•1
0 NO INN Luna 0123)
0 863 CRACJIIMW 4405(g1)
OS SPOTS am
0 ma as Noma
AREAL PROPERTY
A CIVIL RIGHTS
B PRISONER PETITIONS
A LABOR
0 2,0 UM 0300rNaNn
0 230 Pondma 6
0 230 ita Leal Lana
0 210 MN DUN
0 246 Ton MINN 4200PI
0 210 AI Ors Its lortgeti
0 441*440
0 44,200:"Non
0 44371ouleNAccomocalons
a 44 WINN
0 44006w NUNN
0 VOIN4046b Vert 940,044:0
NINA 03.246
0 530 Gest
0 5360eatanpay
0 640 leardama 8 One
0 530C24 Pa
'pall
'
Id Foe Lax San ale
AO
°720 WOW Ignaosewt
Rasa 0
0 730 tax laanwl
Rata
& Dana
as
0 740 Rotary INN as
0 700 Ors Law Leaman
a Ft. traps a
Pc
Srany Ail B
A FEDERAL TAX SUITS
0 PO Toe 0,) 6 NNW! or ONINI00
13 RI Alta
Pa 26 uSC tea
I FILED by
D.C.;
VI. ORIGIN
x 1. Original
0 2. Removed from 0 3. Remanded from
0 4. Refilled
0 6. Multidisbict Litigation
0 7.
Appeal to District Judge from
Proceeding
State Court
Appellate Court
0 5. Transferred from another district
(Specify)
Magistrate Judgment
VII. REQUESTED
CHECK IF THIS IS A
O CLASS ACTION
DEMAND S
IN COMPLAINT
K UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
CI
Check YE
complaint:
JURY DEMAND:
O NO
VIII. RELATED
CASE(S) IF ANY
(See Instructions):
(SEE ATTACHED)
JUDGE
DOCKET NUMBER
DATE
fa .
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
S/F 1.2
REV. 9/94
SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
'
.a )
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Receipt No.
Amount
Date Paid:
Wfp:
51-1/2-2/5
EFTA00222320
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Email Addresses
Phone Numbers
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00222315.pdf |
| File Size | 693.8 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 13,283 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T11:54:39.539423 |