DOJ-OGR-00008411.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1
the witness has personal knowledge.
Filed 12/17/21 Page 17 of 24 29
this can be done through cross-examination
IT would also
stipulations in this regard to
provide the jury any necessary and non-prejudicial context or
for permitting the jury to
understand the background or context without crossing over into
defense to cross-examine law
the investigative steps that were
the
thoroughness of
too, would be permissible
of cross-examination of
levant to impeach a witness by
icating their credibility.
outweighed by 403 prejudice if done along the lines of what
Maxwell these lines of
for example,
questioning would
The Court
would not be substantially
accompanied by a limiting
prior inconsistent
for their imoeachment value and
LB15MAX2
1 THE COURT: (Continuing)
2 imagine
3 questions if
4 encourage the parties to discuss
©
6 background, or other proposals
7
8 the 403 prejudice line.
9 also would permit the
10 enforcement officers about
11 taken if the government puts the
12 investigation into issue as this,
13 impeachment and cross.
14 These articulated lines
15 government witnesses would be re
16 suggesting bias or otherwise imp]
17 Moreover, denying Ms.
18 have implications under the confrontation clause.
19 expects that the probative value
20
21 have indicated, especially if
22 instruction by the Court that,
23 statements are to be considered
24 the like.
25 Similarly,
the Court may instruct the jury that
SOUTHERN D
STRICT
REPORTERS, P.C.
(212)
805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00008411
