DOJ-OGR-00008418.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1 LB15MAX2 Filed 12/17/21 Page 24 of 24 36 . © think it depends on nk you. MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor the trial testimony. THE COURT: Ms. Moe? MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Tha THE COURT: It sounds like th government does need to think about its opening and whether ref alleged victims would open the door, po MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. An government's position that, to the exte offering anything along these lines, it rence to non-testifying tentially, to the issue. d it remains the nt the defense is would be truth for the and, ther fore, hearsay. But given the don't intend to open on this issue, we opening statements would open the door are happy THE COURT: OK. MS. MOE: Thank you, your Hono THE COURT: OK. Thank you. Next is government 8 which are fact that the parties don't believe our to this issu ither, w to raise this issue at the appropriate time. I» prior statements of [ think Ms. Maxwell. from come away the defense that this one may be premat is the specific concern? What are prio are worried about here? MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. For example, the government ha defense in discovery a large volume of the papers agreeing with ure but, Ms. Moe, what r statements that you s produced to the electronically-stored SOUTHERN D STR CT REPORT BRS, Pes (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00008418