DOJ-OGR-00008431.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document555-~ Filed 12/18/21 Page1lof5 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C Jeffrey S. Pagliuca oO 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com joagliuca@hmflaw.com HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN December 15, 2021 VIA Email The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: — United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan, I write in response to the government’s motion to preclude certain testimony by Alexander Hamilton. Based on a defense Rule 26.2 disclosure, the government’s motion identifies four categories of testimony it asks this Court to preclude: (1) Testimony about K atc’ s [a (2) Testimony describing Kate as (3) Testimony about Kate’s statements to Mr. Hamilton. (4) Testimony about Mr. Hamilton’s J of Kate’s account of her alleged abuse. Gov. Letter, pp 8-10. Ms. Maxwell provided Mr. Hamilton’s declaration to the government under Rule 26.2 because that is what the Rule requires. But just as the government does not intend to admit evidence about every disclosure it makes, so too here. DOJ-OGR-00008431