Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00008948.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 697.2 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.3%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document600_ Filed 02/11/22 Page 24 of 37 a part and furtherance of their scheme to abuse minor victims, [Ms. Maxwell] and Jeffrey Epstein enticed and caused minor victims to travel to Epstein’s residences in different states, which [Maxwell] knew and intended would result in their grooming for and subjection to sexual abuse.”). Ms. Maxwell moved to dismiss the multiplicitous conspiracy counts in her pretrial motions. (Dkt. 122, 210, 293). The Court, citing the Second Circuit’s holding in United States v. Josephburg, 459 F.3d 350, 355 (2d Cir. 2006), found that the motion was premature because Ms. Maxwell had not been convicted on the conspiracy counts and, hence, was not yet in jeopardy of receiving multiple punishments for the same offense. (Dkt. 207 at 27-28; Dkt 317 at 9-10). The Court denied Ms. Maxwell’s motion without prejudice, deferring the resolution of the multiplicity claim until after the conclusion of the trial. Jd. The trial is now over, and Ms. Maxwell was convicted on all three conspiracy counts. The government’s theory of prosecution and the proof elicited at trial were entirely aligned with the allegations in the Indictment — that Ms. Maxwell participated in a single criminal conspiracy with Epstein, which may have evolved slightly over time, but always maintained the same overarching objective, the same core participants, and the same method of operation throughout the entire time period in the Indictment. Ms. Maxwell now faces the prospect of being punished multiple times for the same offense in violation of her rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause. Accordingly, we move the Court to impose judgement on only one of the three conspiracy counts. A. Applicable Law “An indictment is multiplicitous when it charges a single offense as an offense multiple times, in separate counts, when, in law and fact, only one crime has been committed.” United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140, 145 (2d Cir. 1999). Multiplicitous indictments violate the 19 DOJ-OGR-00008948

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00008948.jpg

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00008948.jpg
File Size 697.2 KB
OCR Confidence 94.3%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,037 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 17:39:50.179924