DOJ-OGR-00008972.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document605- Filed 02/18/22 Page1of3 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: United States of America, —V— 20-CR-330 (AJN) Ghislaine Maxwell, ORDER Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties’ proposed redactions to the Defendant’s motion for a new trial, the Government’s response in opposition, and the Defendant’s reply in support. See Dkt. No. 596. The parties did not propose any redactions to Juror 50’s motion nor the parties letters dated January 13, 2022. See id. at 7. The Defendant submitted a letter justifying her proposed redactions, Dkt. No. 602, and the Government submitted an opposition to the proposals, Dkt. No. 603. The Court determines that the following proposed redactions are not consistent with the Court’s prior order, Dkt. No. 596, because they redact information that is widely reported in the press and/or redact legal arguments: e Defense Br. at: o i, lines 17-18; o 21, lines 1-2; o 49, lines 16-21; o 51, lines 10-16; o 57, lines 5-7 e Gov. Resp. at: DOJ-OGR-00008972