DOJ-OGR-00009013.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document613_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 12 of 66 If a potential juror selected either “yes” option, the questionnaire asked individuals to explain their answer in writing, to state whether having been a victim of sexual assault, sexual abuse, or sexual harassment would affect their ability to serve fairly and impartially, and if so, to explain why. Finally, Question 50 asked potential jurors if there was any experience that they had that might affect their ability to serve fairly and impartial as a juror. Six-hundred and ninety-four individuals answered the questionnaire. B. Juror No. 50’s questionnaire Juror No. 50’s questionnaire is attached as EXHIBIT 1. Under the penalty of perjury, Juror. No. 50 answered these questions as follows: e Question 13: “Yes,” Juror No. 50 could decide the case solely based on the evidence or lack of evidence and not based on bias, sympathy, or prejudice. e Question 25: “No,” Juror No. 50 had never been the victim of a crime. e Question 42: “No,” there was nothing about the nature of the allegations against Ms. Maxwell that “might make it difficult” for Juror No. 50 to be fair and impartial. e Question 43: “No,” Juror No. 50 did not have any views about laws concerning the age of consent that would affect his ability to be fair and impartial. e Question 44: “No,” Juror No. 50 did not have any views about the laws governing sex trafficking and sex crimes against minors that would affect his ability to be fair and impartial. DOJ-OGR-00009013