DOJ-OGR-00009564.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page2of51 Table of Contents PRELIMINARY STATEMENT | csccsmerncnnamnancninna nanan cena 2 LEGAL STANDARD sss icmnnmnancim anni acne nmn aa aOR TE ER TE ETT 2 PACE ed 3 I. The Defendant Was Convicted of the Crimes Charged in the Indictment, So No Constructive Amendment or Variance OCCUITEd........ ee eeeeeeeeceeeeeseeecneeceeeeeneesaeesaeeeseeseneeeaeeraeenes 3 BS, AMPSICOBIG TO msn ers: een seReRERREIE RRR saREMNORIRED sermeRMRNT 4 B. DISCUSSION ...........ceeeeeeeeenceceneeeseeeeneesaeecseeceaeesneesaeecaeeceaeeuenessaeesaeecaeesnessneesaeesnaeeneneeenee 6 Il. The Court Should Enter Judgment on Counts Three and Five .........eeeeseeeeeeeeeeeneeeeeeeees 24 A. Applicable Law... cecceeccsecessecseceeeeeeneeseeecaecaeeeseessneesaaecaeeseeesneesaeesnaeeeerereneeeneees 25 B. DISCUSSION ..........::ceeceeeeeesececeeeeeneesneesseecaeessneesaeecsaeceaeesneesaeecaecseeseneesaeecsaeeeneeeneeeneees 26 Ill. The Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Her Conviction and Dismiss the Indictment Based on Alleged Improper Pre-Trial Delay Should Be Denied... ee eeceeeeeeneeeeeceereeeeeeeaeecnaeeneneesnee 33 A. The Defendant Has Failed to Demonstrate Actual and Substantial Prejudice .......... 34 B. The Defendant Has Failed to Establish that the Government Delayed the Indictment for an Improper PUrpose ..........ecceeeceeeeeceeeeeeeeeeseeceaeeeeessneesaeecaeeeeeesneesaeecnaeenseeseeeesaeersaeenes 44 IV. The Court Should Deny the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Under Rule 2 —_asemenameasies somammanernste ancERARSDNNES TENURES SRCRERIOSRUASTEG HORORRATEICODNGFBG HENCE BUSING Hatoneoe 47 CONCLUSION ..........sccscsssccsscsscsssosssvssensscscscsscscsesssesssnscnesssecocseesssessnesensscessosseesseessnesesscossossooese 50 DOJ-OGR- 00009564