Redaction Analysis Engine
Who's Behind the Black Bars?
Redaction Types
FOIA Exemption Decoder
Redaction Clusters
Search & Filter Redactions
| Document | Type | FOIA | Context | Top Candidate | Score | Signals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOJ-OGR-00003423.jpg | tagged | — |
...bit 9 to
Villafafia June 2, 2017 Declaration: Deposition of [REDACTED], State v. Epstein, Case No. 2006-CF-9454, at 44,
50, 51 (Fe...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00003859.jpg | foia | b1A |
...defendant
intends to introduce at trial. Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A); United States v. Smith, 985 F. Supp.
2d 506, 522 (S.D.N.Y....
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00003929.jpg | foia | b1A |
...1 — Preliminary disclosure of information subject to Rule 16(b)(1)(A) and
16(b)(1)(B)
e The government proposes June 11 for the ...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00003929.jpg | foia | b1B |
...disclosure of information subject to Rule 16(b)(1)(A) and
16(b)(1)(B)
e The government proposes June 11 for the defense to discl...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00004085.jpg | foia | b1A |
...al
commencement date.” See Dkt. No. 250. Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(A) applies to documents and
objects that the defendant intends...
|
Mort Zuckerman | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00004085.jpg | foia | b1B |
... the defendant’s case-in-chief at trial. Fed. R. Crim. P.
16(b)(1)(B) applies to reports of examinations or tests and witnesses w...
|
Mort Zuckerman | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00004257.jpg | foia | b1A |
...isclosures pursuant
to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(b)(1)(A) and 16(b)(1)(B) by November 1, 2021, or 4
weeks in advance ...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00004257.jpg | foia | b1B |
...ant
to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(b)(1)(A) and 16(b)(1)(B) by November 1, 2021, or 4
weeks in advance of trial. This d...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00004545.jpg | tagged | — |
...bit 9 to
Villafafia June 2, 2017 Declaration: Deposition of [REDACTED], State v. Epstein, Case No. 2006-CF-9454, at 44,
50, 51 (Fe...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00005429.jpg | foia | b3A |
...) (quoting Regan,
103 F.3d at 1082); see Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3)(A)(iv) (listing, among pretrial motions, “a
defect in institut...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00006396.jpg | foia | b3A |
...) (quoting Regan,
103 F.3d at 1082); see Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3)(A)(iv) (listing, among pretrial motions, “a
defect in institut...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00008045.jpg | foia | b1C |
...
of possible bases does not meet the requirements of Rule 16(b)(1)(C).” United States v. Tuzman,
2017 WL 6527261, at *10 (S.D.N.Y...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00008057.jpg | foia | b1C |
...mony
that the defendant intends to use.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(C). The Rule requires that the expert
disclose what his testim...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00008196.jpg | foia | b1A |
...es v. Medearis, 380 F.3d 1049, 1057 (8th Cir.
2004) (Rule 16(b)(1)(A) does not require defense to disclose evidence he does “not ...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00008196.jpg | foia | b1A |
... States v. Moore, 208 F.3d 577, 579 (7th Cir. 2000) (Rule
16(b)(1)(A) does not require defense to disclose evidence used to impea...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00008196.jpg | foia | b1A |
...le cross-examining Jane. Under Rule 16(b)
‘Nor does Rule 16(b)(1)(A) apply to material a defendant uses to refresh a witness’s
r...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00009554.jpg | foia | b2A |
...s an
enumerated exception to the rule. See Fed. R. Evid. 606(b)(2)(A). To the extent that argument is
raised, it is meritless. In...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00010442.jpg | foia | b4B |
...ced a minor to engage
in a commercial sex act.’ USSG § 2G1.1(b)(4)(B) (2003) (emphasis added). There is no
evidence that “Jane” o...
|
Anil Ambani | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00010442.jpg | foia | b2B |
...sed the voluntariness of the minor’s behavior.”
USSG § 2G1.3(b)(2)(B), Appl. Note 3(B). “[T]he defining characteristic of undue i...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00010443.jpg | foia | b2B |
...liminating the enhancements under §§ 4B1.5,
3B1.1, and 2G1.3(b)(2)(B), the correct sentencing range is 51-63 months, based on a t...
|
Anil Ambani | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00010567.jpg | foia | b2B |
...res the
category of sex offenses against minors, and § 2G1.3(b)(2)(B) applies to the use of undue
influence. See United States v....
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00010567.jpg | foia | b2B |
... 444, 446-47 (2d Cir. 2021) (describing
the focus of § 2B1.3(b)(2)(B)); United States v. Arbaugh, 951 F. 3d 167, 173 (4th Cir. 20...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00010567.jpg | foia | b2B |
...F. 3d 167, 173 (4th Cir. 2020) (“By
its plain terms, § 2G1.3(b)(2)(B) focuses on a different aggravating factor (undue influence)...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00020427.jpg | foia | b1B |
...21: Defense
disclosures pursuant to Rules 16(b)(1)(A) and 16(b)(1)(B) materials (The Government
proposed November 1, 2021; the D...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
| DOJ-OGR-00020528.jpg | foia | b1B |
...21: Defense
disclosures pursuant to Rules 16(b)(1)(A) and 16(b)(1)(B) materials (The Government
proposed November 1, 2021; the De...
|
Lawrence Krauss | 35% |
context
|
Methodology & Disclaimer
Candidate predictions are algorithmic estimates generated by pattern matching against document context, redaction length, FOIA exemption codes, and known associate proximity. They are NOT confirmed identities and are NOT accusations. This tool is for research purposes only. Not all redactions hide guilty parties — some exist for procedural, privacy, or national security reasons.
Signal weights: Length Match (35%), Context Keywords (25%), Name Proximity (25%), FOIA Role Match (15%). Scores above 70% = High Confidence, 40-70% = Medium, below 40% = Low.