66 results for "court deposition subpoena"

Page 2 of 3
DOJ-OGR-00003552.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  1141.0 KB
...Here, there is no such deficiency in the form of request nor a challenge by the recipient of the subpoena. Indeed, in Chemical Bank, which cited Martindell, the district court opined that had the Government obtained judicial relief to issue an such as documents and depositions are not likely to...
DOJ-OGR-00003546.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  1139.9 KB
...The Court held that the Government was not entitled to the materials unless it could show either that the protective order was improvidently granted or some extraordinary circumstance or compelling need for the material; see also In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Apr. 19, 1991 (“Subpoena Duces Tecum...
DOJ-OGR-00003783.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  636.4 KB
...In Martindell, the Second Circuit held that “the proper procedure” to obtain confidential material under a Protective Order, “as the Government should know, was either to subpoena the deposition transcripts for use in a pending proceeding such as a grand jury investigation or trial, in which the issue could be...
DOJ-OGR-00002368.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  716.6 KB
...CONCLUSION For these reasons, this Court should: (1) suppress all evidence the government obtained from QM and any other evidence derived therefrom; or (2) suppress the April and July 2016 depositions and all evidence derived therefrom; and (3) dismiss Counts Five and Six. Maxwell requests an evidentiary hearing on this...
DOJ-OGR-00003786.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  697.8 KB
...material from Boies Schiller when the two deposition transcripts don’t even total 1,000 pages. Fourth, the government misunderstands the burden of proof. The government tries to fault Maxwell for seeking “suppression of a// evidence [it] obtained pursuant to the subpoena,” calling this a “windfall.” Resp. at 95. But...
DOJ-OGR-00002813.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  1232.7 KB
...A motion to quash the Subpoena is not yet ripe because, without having the benefit of the Defendant’s sealed briefing on her motion and any other orders pertaining to it, it appears that the Court has not granted Defendant’s motion for an order authorizing service of the Subpoena...
DOJ-OGR-00002878.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  1175.0 KB
...A motion to quash the Subpoena is not yet ripe because, without having the benefit of the Defendant’s sealed briefing on her motion and any other orders pertaining to it, it appears that the Court has not granted Defendant’s motion for an order authorizing service of the Subpoena...
DOJ-OGR-00002937.jpg
OCR Confidence: 73%  •  857.7 KB
...April 2016 Deposition ..........ceeceecceeseessceceneeeeneeseeecaeceneeseneeeaeesaeeeseeseneeeaeesnaeeeeeeeeneesaeeed 123 2. July 2016 Deposition... ec ceeccseceesceceeeceeeeeeeeeseeeceaeeeseeseeeesaeecaeenseeseneesaeesnaeeneeeeeneesaeees 129 3. Matteriality 2.0... ceeceseceeeeeeeeeeeeeceeeeesecesneeseeecaeecsaeessnesseeessaecaeesnesseeesseecsaeeeeeesneesaeesateres 135 ii DOJ-OGR- 00002937
DOJ-OGR-00003042.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  893.7 KB
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 108 of 239 way circumvented Martindell; rather, the Government sought court approval to enforce a subpoena and then followed the directives it received.*’ Most critically, however, even if the Government’s motion did not satisfy Martindell, Maxwell...
DOJ-OGR-00003046.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  735.2 KB
...deposition transcripts would be private.” (Def. Mot. 11 at 9). Neither argument withstands scrutiny. As an initial matter, the facts of this case are far removed from the “narrow” circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while...
DOJ-OGR-00004162.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  739.5 KB
...Maxwell also had a privacy interest in the materials subject to the subpoena, including most especially her deposition transcripts. Mot. Ex. A (defining “confidential” material as that which “implicates common law and statutory privacy interests of... Ghislaine Maxwell”); see U.S. CONST. amend. IV. The government violated these rights when...
DOJ-OGR-00003039.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  749.6 KB
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 105 of 239 information protected thereunder, it was error for the district court to modify the magistrate’s orders”). At the same time, in Martindell, the court noted that “[t]he reliance of a private party upon...
DOJ-OGR-00019659.jpg
OCR Confidence: 92%  •  699.3 KB
...Maxwell is free to share the identity of ““Court-1” and “Court-2” and the fact that the Government obtained an order from Court-1 permitting the Recipient to comply with a subpoena for materials 3 Surely due process does not contemplate a scenario in which Ms. Maxwell is never...
DOJ-OGR-00003105.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  820.0 KB
...criminal prosecution was nonetheless plainly on her mind at the time of the depositions, as evidenced by the myriad arguments she herself makes in support of her motions to suppress the fruits of the grand jury subpoena to Boies Schiller. (See, e.g., Def. Mot. 3 at 3-4, Def...
DOJ-OGR-00002358.jpg
OCR Confidence: 92%  •  625.5 KB
...district court found, “a significant, if not determinative, factor” in reaching a settlement was its confidentiality. /d. at 446. After the case was settled and concluded, Maxwell repeatedly invoked Paragraph 12 of the Protective Order and demanded that Giuffre either return or destroy all confidential information, including her deposition transcripts...
DOJ-OGR-00004902.jpg
OCR Confidence: 92%  •  1485.3 KB
...And I believe it will apply to the docketed filings in the case and not, for example, the underlying discovery materials, deposition materials, investigation materials. THE. COURT: Okay. MR. ROSSMILLER: And so I think that, unfortunately, for the circumstances, for perhaps all of us, that even were the Second Circuit...
DOJ-OGR-00019640.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  703.9 KB
...Although the District Court did not modify the Protective Order, Judge Nathan authorized Maxwell to convey, under seal, to the appropriate ju- dicial officer the fact that the Government obtained an order from Court-1 permitting the Recipient to comply with a subpoena for materials covered by a protective order...
DOJ-OGR-00019663.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  760.3 KB
...Maxwell about the subpoena; Rule 6(e) does not apply to grand jury witnesses. United States vy. Sells Eng’s, Inc., 463 U.S. 418, 425 (1983). Despite the government’s attempt (once again) to mischaracterize Ms. Maxwell’s argument,° this Court need not in this case wade into the...
DOJ-OGR-00004788.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  706.7 KB
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 307 Filed 06/25/21 Page4of21 a protective order to the Government absent a formal motion or subpoena. It further held that a court should modify a protective order that a party reasonably relied on only if the order had been improvidently granted...
DOJ-OGR-00016167.jpg
OCR Confidence: 90%  •  637.9 KB
...THE COURT: I'm going to overrule it at the opening stage. I did not preclude the line of argumentation; I wasn't asked to preclude the line of argumentation. You raised the prospect -- you did certainly and I appreciate it, raise the prospect related to a subpoena of a...
DOJ-OGR-00002561.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  668.2 KB
...The Court held that Smith has “assumed the risk” that the telephone company’s records “would be divulged to police.” Jd. at 745. Similarly, in United States v. Miller, the Court ruled that the government could subpoena an individual’s bank records, including several months of canceled checks, deposit slips...
DOJ-OGR-00011722.jpg
OCR Confidence: 90%  •  637.6 KB
...THE COURT: stage. I did not preci asked to preclude the lin prospect -- you did certainly and I prospect related to a subpoena of agree with the government would be able -- but if existing nonprivileged in in that were asked, is ent the prof appreciate it, You raised wer mor...
DOJ-OGR-00002364.jpg
OCR Confidence: 93%  •  697.7 KB
...So did the district court in permitting these intrusions and ordering Maxwell to sit for a second deposition. Maxwell likewise relied on the Protective Order in choosing to render such intimate details, rather than assert her Fifth Amendment privilege as she had every right to do. And why shouldn’t...
DOJ-OGR-00014120.jpg
OCR Confidence: 90%  •  614.9 KB
...THE COURT: Yo MS. COMEY: We MR. EVERDELL: MS. COMEY: Your Honor, THE COURT: that this might be relevant. the entire transcript as discovery last w lready have, your "92 comment, '93, according ll provide the transcript. Honor. We produced k when we realized Given we got there this issue...
DOJ-OGR-00016743.jpg
OCR Confidence: 90%  •  615.2 KB
...THE COURT: Yo MS. COMEY: We MR. EVERDELL: MS. COMEY: Your Honor, THE COURT: that this might be relevant. the entire transcript as discovery last w lready have, your "92 comment, '93, according ll provide the transcript. Honor. We produced k when we realized Given we got there this issue...

Search Tips