676 results for "2016"
Page 21 of 28
DOJ-OGR-00008855.jpg
...Silver, 2016 WL 1572993, at *3 (citing Newsday
LLC v. Cty. of Nassau, 730 F.3d 156, 166, 167 n.15 (2d Cir. 2013)). If it is a “judicial document,”
the Court must next determine whether the common law right of access or the “more robust”
First Amendment right of...
DOJ-OGR-00002551.jpg
...F.2d 1221 (2d Cir. 1991)... eee cess eseeeeeeeees 14
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, JK-15-029, 828 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 2016) oe eeeeeeeeeee 4,5, 11
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) .o..eccecsessseesscesecnsesseeseeeseesseessecnaecsaesaeeseesseeaeenaeenaesas 2, 6
Murphy v. Waterfront Comm’n of New...
DOJ-OGR-00006890.jpg
...feasibility of rectifying that prejudice by
a continuance, and any other relevant circumstances.” United States v. Lee, 834 F.3d 145, 159
(2d Cir. 2016) (quoting United States v. Pineros, 532 F.2d 868, 871 (2d Cir. 1976)). The
appropriate remedy is exclusion. Ms. Maxwell has been in jail for...
DOJ-OGR-00000300.jpg
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document6-1 Filed 07/11/19 Page11of15
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-62 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 11 of
1S
IN RE:
INVESTIGATION OF
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
f
ADDENDUM TO THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT
{Y APPEARING that the...
DOJ-OGR-00001490.jpg
...In
2016, the defendant gave deposition testimony in connection with a civil lawsuit in the Southern
District of New York. During the deposition, the defendant was asked questions about her role in
facilitating the abuse of minors. The defendant repeatedly lied under oath when questioned about
her conduct with minor...
DOJ-OGR-00008904.jpg
...See Silver, 2016
WL 1572993, at *5 (citing United States v. Doe, 63 F.3d 121, 128 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Compelling
interests may include the defendant’s right to a fair trial.”’”)). Sealing is warranted to protect a
defendant's fair trial rights if the Court makes specific findings that...
DOJ-OGR-00004154.jpg
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 _ Filed 05/20/21 Page 19 of 34
For one thing, the government admits that Giuffre’s attorneys turned over several
documents in 2016, which were in the government’s possession when AUSA J claimed
to Judge McMahon that he did not...
DOJ-OGR-00008856.jpg
...See Silver, 2016
WL 1572993, at *5 (citing United States v. Doe, 63 F.3d 121, 128 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Compelling
interests may include the defendant’s right to a fair trial.”’”)). Sealing is warranted to protect a
defendant's fair trial rights if the Court makes specific findings that...
DOJ-OGR-00003905.jpg
...Maxwell’s responses to questions about, for example,
whether she could give a list of people under the age of 18 who came to Epstein’s house or
whether she could identify sex toys—which she made in the context of a 2016 defamation claim
brought by an unrelated person...
DOJ-OGR-00003978.jpg
...It is also noteworthy that
when it claimed investigative privilege in its 2016 privilege log, BSF did not invoke the work
product exception.
DOJ-OGR- 00003978
DOJ-OGR-00011242.jpg
...Request 9, The Journal
Accuser-2 has been represented by BSF since approximately 2016. She sued Ms.
Maxwell and participated in the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. She claims to have kept a
journal for a period in 1996 in which she described various events, including her interactions
with Jeffrey Epstein...
DOJ-OGR-00006242.jpg
...time to be “within the
ken of the ordinary juror”); United States v. Redwood, 216 F. Supp. 3d 890, 897-99 (N.D. Ill. 2016)
(excluding memory expert under Rules 702 and 403, and noting that “[w]hile in unique
circumstances expert testimony regarding memory and perception may be warranted...
DOJ-OGR-00019468.jpg
...13-cr-48, 2016 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 194426, at *11 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2016). The Defense argues this interest is
significantly diminished for individuals who have spoken on the public record about Ms.
Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein, because they have voluntarily chosen to identify themselves.
But...
DOJ-OGR-00002368.jpg
...CONCLUSION
For these reasons, this Court should: (1) suppress all evidence the government obtained
from QM and any other evidence derived therefrom; or (2) suppress the April and July
2016 depositions and all evidence derived therefrom; and (3) dismiss Counts Five and Six.
Maxwell requests an evidentiary hearing on this...
DOJ-OGR-00003068.jpg
...Discussion
The defendant argues that the Due Process Clause requires the suppression of the evidence
the Government obtained pursuant to subpoena, including the April and July 2016 depositions,
and the dismissal of Counts Five and Six. The defendant falls far short of carrying the very heavy
burden of establishing a...
DOJ-OGR-00003630.jpg
...Regardless of whether one believes the appropriate point in time
to define the comparable community population should be as of November 1, 2016 or some date
thereafter, the best available data to estimate the demographics of the community is the 5-year
2018 ACS.
19. Using the ACS data concerning...
DOJ-OGR-00003786.jpg
...And as to Count 6 in particular
(alleging perjury in the July 2016 deposition), the government concedes, as it must, that Judge
Preska has refused to unseal all of the testimony charged in the indictment, except one question
and one answer. Resp. at 94 n.41. The government offers no...
DOJ-OGR-00004826.jpg
...Press Release, 2/17/2005; N.T., 2/2/2016, Exh. D-4.
D.A. Castor did not communicate to Constand or her counsel his decision to
permanently forego prosecuting Cosby. In fact, Constand did not learn of the decision
until a reporter appeared at one of her civil attorney...
DOJ-OGR-00006224.jpg
...Cir.1984))); see also LVL XII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier
S\A., 209 F. Supp. 3d 612, 642 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (expert opinion inadmissible where it is “a
mismatch for the facts” of the case).
C. Discussion
1. Response to the Opinions of Dr. Rocchio
Although...
DOJ-OGR-00008188.jpg
...only in unusual circumstances. See Carter, 410 F.3d at
950; United States v. Redwood, 216 F. Supp. 3d 890, 899 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (“While in unique
circumstances expert testimony regarding memory and perception may be warranted, this is not
one of those cases.”); Heine, 2017 WL 5260784, at...
DOJ-OGR-00002283.jpg
...Maxwell made materially false
statements at two civil depositions in 2016 that were part of a defamation action brought against
her more than twenty years after the conduct alleged in Counts One through Four supposedly
took place (1994-1997). The plaintiff in the defamation action, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, made
wild...
DOJ-OGR-00011134.jpg
...rectifying that prejudice by a continuance, and any other
relevant circumstances.” /d. (quoting United States v. Lee, 834 F.3d 145, 159 (2d Cir. 2016)).
When a disclosure merely lists general topics on which the expert might testify, the Second
Circuit has several times held that the district court has...
DOJ-OGR-00011141.jpg
...rectifying that prejudice by a continuance, and any other
relevant circumstances.” /d. (quoting United States v. Lee, 834 F.3d 145, 159 (2d Cir. 2016)).
When a disclosure merely lists general topics on which the expert might testify, the Second
Circuit has several times held that the district court has...
DOJ-OGR-00004141.jpg
...The government now confesses that it had significant and substantial contact with
Virginia Giuffre’s attorneys in 2016—while the Giuffre defamation suit against Maxwell was
on-going—as part of an effort to instigate a criminal prosecution of Maxwell for allegedly
trafficking Giuffre and others and then lying under...
DOJ-OGR-00004862.jpg
...at 57 (citing N.T.,
2/2/2016, at 232, 234, 236). The record does not contradict his testimony. There is no
evidence, nor any real contention, that the parties even contemplated a grant of immunity
under Section 5947. The trial court’s finding that the interaction between D.A...
Search Tips
- Use quotes for exact phrases:
"flight manifest" - Use OR for alternatives:
bank OR financial - Use wildcard for partial matches:
invest* - Exclude words:
document -redacted - Search names:
John Smith