318 results for "witness statement testified"

Page 3 of 13
DOJ-OGR-00012078.jpg
OCR Confidence: 90%  •  600.3 KB
...a witness' she says she it's not an inconsistent statement. You have to get to a point of inconsistency. MS. MENNINGER: Here is the inconsistency. THE COURT: When you're doing it based on what she testified to yesterday, if there's a difference, yes. MS. MENNINGER: That's...
DOJ-OGR-00017667.jpg
OCR Confidence: 90%  •  600.3 KB
...a witness' she says she it's not an inconsistent statement. You have to get to a point of inconsistency. MS. MENNINGER: Here is the inconsistency. THE COURT: When you're doing it based on what she testified to yesterday, if there's a difference, yes. MS. MENNINGER: That's...
DOJ-OGR-00008397.jpg
OCR Confidence: 89%  •  607.0 KB
...it becomes relevant, the government may offer prior statements before the witness testifies if the defense attacks the credibility in opening statements and it's clear that the witness will be subject to cross-examination. United States v. Flores, 945 F.3d 687, (2d Cir. 2019). That's restating the...
DOJ-OGR-00013349.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  605.9 KB
...18 So with respect to the business records issue, here, 19 this witness has testified —- 20 THE COURT: So the contention is that it's a business 2] record? 22 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. In addition, it's 23 memorializing the statement of the person calling at the time...
DOJ-OGR-00018933.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  606.0 KB
...18 So with respect to the business records issue, here, 19 this witness has testified —- 20 THE COURT: So the contention is that it's a business 2] record? 22 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. In addition, it's 23 memorializing the statement of the person calling at the time...
DOJ-OGR-00008432.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  667.1 KB
...Hamilton about these statements. “The law is well settled in this Circuit, as in others, that bias of a witness is not a collateral issue and extrinsic evidence is admissible to prove that a witness has a motive to testify falsely.” United States v. Harvey, 547 F.2d 720, 722...
DOJ-OGR-00004253.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  890.9 KB
...These materials will include testifying witness statements, which themselves will also include any co- conspirator statements about which witnesses may testify at trial. This deadline, which is far in advance of when such disclosures are ordinarily made in this District, will provide the defense with ample time to review these...
DOJ-OGR-00005601.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  580.9 KB
...Maxwell raised concerns about lack of memory and available witnesses in her Motion to Dismiss for Pre-Indictment Delay, Dkt. 138. It has been difficult to track down and interview relevant percipient witnesses to the alleged events. The failure of disclosure of critical alleged coconspirator statements makes it impossible to...
DOJ-OGR-00006563.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  580.3 KB
...Maxwell raised concerns about lack of memory and available witnesses in her Motion to Dismiss for Pre-Indictment Delay, Dkt. 138. It has been difficult to track down and interview relevant percipient witnesses to the alleged events. The failure of disclosure of critical alleged coconspirator statements makes it impossible to...
DOJ-OGR-00005866.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  735.9 KB
...Moreover, the defendant’s prior statements are of course appropriate material for cross-examination of the defendant. The Government also consents to the defense request to redact the perjury counts from the Indictment. (Def. Mot. 6 at 6). Finally, the defense seeks to preclude the Government’s law enforcement witnesses...
DOJ-OGR-00006791.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  735.1 KB
...Moreover, the defendant’s prior statements are of course appropriate material for cross-examination of the defendant. The Government also consents to the defense request to redact the perjury counts from the Indictment. (Def. Mot. 6 at 6). Finally, the defense seeks to preclude the Government’s law enforcement witnesses...
DOJ-OGR-00011245.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  767.0 KB
...statement--that in fairness ought to be considered at the same time.” Federal Rule of Evidence 612 is also applicable here and states: (a) Scope. This rule gives an adverse party certain options when a witness uses a writing to refresh memory: (1) while testifying; or (2) before testifying, if...
DOJ-OGR-00016748.jpg
OCR Confidence: 88%  •  596.8 KB
...De that, quote, of a prior inconsis the wit deny the statemen to examine the wit My colleague, hopefully laid out the proper steps of First, statement, in to be impeached. fact, tness about it. Judge Kaplan, in tent statement under 613(b), the Gul the anal Lani lysis. Fore...
DOJ-OGR-00011681.jpg
OCR Confidence: 93%  •  617.2 KB
...If the defendant does present a defense case, the defense witnesses will testify and the government will have the opportunity to cross-examine them. After the presentation of evidence is completed, the parties will deliver their closing arguments to summarize and interpret th vidence. Just as the parties' opening statements...
DOJ-OGR-00003705.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  719.1 KB
...However, the Government’s proposed disclosure schedule—which will afford Maxwell at least six weeks to investigate testifying witness statements—allows Maxwell significantly more time to review disclosures than schedules adopted in most cases in this District. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001...
DOJ-OGR-00008603.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  740.5 KB
...You have heard the testimony of a witness who was previously convicted of a crime, punishable by more than one year in jail. This prior conviction was put into evidence for you to consider in evaluating the witness’ credibility. You may consider the fact that the witness who testified is...
DOJ-OGR-00008683.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  725.8 KB
...You have heard the testimony of a witness who was previously convicted of a crime, punishable by more than one year in jail. This prior conviction was put into evidence for you to consider in evaluating the witness’ credibility. You may consider the fact that the witness who testified is...
DOJ-OGR-00008769.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  725.8 KB
...You have heard the testimony of a witness who was previously convicted of a crime, punishable by more than one year in jail. This prior conviction was put into evidence for you to consider in evaluating the witness’ credibility. You may consider the fact that the witness who testified is...
DOJ-OGR-00011326.jpg
OCR Confidence: 91%  •  623.0 KB
...Burge, “Testifying by giving an identifying number [or alias] rather than a [true] name does not necessarily curtail any trial rights. The cross-examiner can question the witness’ activities ... without regard to the witness’ name, and similarly has an opportunity to see and hear that which he testifies about.” No...
DOJ-OGR-00004085.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  784.3 KB
...Rule 26.2 Does Not Mandate Advance Disclosure of Statements of Prospective Defense Witnesses. Rule 26.2(a) provides: After a witness other than the defendant has testified on direct examination, the court, on motion of a party who did not call the witness, must order an attorney for the...
DOJ-OGR-00003923.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  639.4 KB
...e The Government is prepared to produce a proposed witness list, Giglio material, and Jencks Act material by May 28, 2021, or 45 days in advance of trial. These materials will include testifying witness statements, which themselves will also include any co-conspirator statements about which witnesses may testify at...
DOJ-OGR-00020790.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  649.0 KB
...However, the Government’s proposed disclosure schedule—which will afford Maxwell at least six weeks to investigate testifying witness statements—allows Maxwell significantly more time to review disclosures than schedules adopted in most cases in this District. See, e.g., United States v. Rueb, No. 00-CR-91 (RWS), 2001...
DOJ-OGR-00005431.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  700.7 KB
...For individuals who are not witnesses and not hearsay declarants, however, none of those rules apply. Instead, those non-witnesses’ “credibility is irrelevant.” United States v. McGowan, 58 F.3d 8, 15-16 (2d Cir. 1995). The Second Circuit has therefore “clearly established . . . the principle that a statement not offered...
DOJ-OGR-00006398.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  700.8 KB
...For individuals who are not witnesses and not hearsay declarants, however, none of those rules apply. Instead, those non-witnesses’ “credibility is irrelevant.” United States v. McGowan, 58 F.3d 8, 15-16 (2d Cir. 1995). The Second Circuit has therefore “clearly established . . . the principle that a statement not offered...
DOJ-OGR-00016126.jpg
OCR Confidence: 91%  •  617.4 KB
...If the defendant does present a defense case, the defense witnesses will testify and the government will have the opportunity to cross-examine them. After the presentation of evidence is completed, the parties will deliver their closing arguments to summarize and interpret th vidence. Just as the parties' opening statements...

Search Tips