1,154 results for "2008"

Page 32 of 47
DOJ-OGR-00000671.jpg
OCR Confidence: 91%  •  645.2 KB
...allowed for In 2008, we Rights Act because our clients' your Honor knows, a the process. filed that cas favor that their rights were violated. While some of they wer them that opportunity should always be rights were violated, federal judge has ruled in our clien means a lot to...
DOJ-OGR-00003198.jpg
OCR Confidence: 88%  •  811.8 KB
...SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 — JUNE 30, 2008: AFTER THE NPA IS SIGNED, THE USAO MAKES VARIOUS VICTIM NOTIFICATION DECISIONS.......... cesses 206 XX DOJ-OGR- 00003198
DOJ-OGR-00010679.jpg
OCR Confidence: 81%  •  749.1 KB
...The photos attrched as Exhibit show me in.a coms in hospital after my first suicide attenrpt in 2008. The photos in Exhibit 2 are of me in the hospital after my second suicide attempt in October 2018 during my litigation agzinst Epstein, Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff ard Natalia...
DOJ-OGR-00004320.jpg
OCR Confidence: 87%  •  812.0 KB
...SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 — JUNE 30, 2008: AFTER THE NPA IS SIGNED, THE USAO MAKES VARIOUS VICTIM NOTIFICATION DECISIONS. ..........ceceeeeeees 206 XX DOJ-OGR-00004320
DOJ-OGR-00006957.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  663.3 KB
...5 made also be a member.” Jn re Terrorist Bombings of U.S. Embassies in East Africa, 552 F.3d 93, 139 (2d Cir. 2008). With respect to the second prong of this rule, a statement is in furtherance of a conspiracy if it was in some way designed to...
DOJ-OGR-00009060.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  718.9 KB
...1s not a request by a journalist to intervene for public access. See United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72, 81 (2d Cir. 2008) (motion to intervene to assert the public’s First Amendment right of access to criminal proceedings is proper). Nor is the request from a subpoena...
DOJ-OGR-00009145.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  679.8 KB
...22 Page 26 of 49 that “personal experiences” are “permissible influences on jury deliberations”); Arreola v. Choudry, 533 F.3d 601, 606 (7th Cir. 2008) (jurors “are entitled to evaluate the evidence presented at trial in light of their own experience’’). Thus, so long as they do not introduce extra...
DOJ-OGR-00010574.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  748.4 KB
...Specifically, in a letter dated July 10, 2008, the USAO-SDFL 37 DOJ-OGR-00010574
DOJ-OGR-00006705.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  819.4 KB
...to intervene in criminal proceedings to assert the public’s right of access. United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72, 81 (2d Cir. 2008). Please confirm receipt and docket this timely responsive filing, making Inner City Press an Interested Party, and thank you for your attention to it as...
DOJ-OGR-00009751.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  718.4 KB
...1s not a request by a journalist to intervene for public access. See United States v. Aref, 533 F.3d 72, 81 (2d Cir. 2008) (motion to intervene to assert the public’s First Amendment right of access to criminal proceedings is proper). Nor is the request from a subpoena...
DOJ-OGR-00009824.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  680.0 KB
...22 Page 26 of 49 that “personal experiences” are “permissible influences on jury deliberations”); Arreola v. Choudry, 533 F.3d 601, 606 (7th Cir. 2008) (jurors “are entitled to evaluate the evidence presented at trial in light of their own experience’’). Thus, so long as they do not introduce extra...
DOJ-OGR-00010144.jpg
OCR Confidence: 93%  •  763.0 KB
...ACTIVITIES Chair, American Bar Association Center for Professional Responsibility, Policy Implementation Committee, 2004-2008 (Member 2002-2010). Member, American Bar Association Commission on Multijurisdictional Practice, 2000-2002. Consultant, Task Force on Lawyer Advertising of the New York State Bar Association (2005). Retained by the New Jersey Supreme Court, in connection...
DOJ-OGR-00004163.jpg
OCR Confidence: 93%  •  708.6 KB
...To obtain a Franks hearing, a defendant must make a “substantial preliminary showing,” United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110, 125 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56), that (1) there were “inaccuracies or omissions” in the affidavit, (i1) “the alleged falsehoods or omissions were...
DOJ-OGR-00002940.jpg
OCR Confidence: 77%  •  663.6 KB
...124 (2008) oo. cee seseeseessceseessecseeseeeseesaecaecnaecaeesaesseeaeesaessaesseesaessaeenaesseeeaeeseseatenaee 51 Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States, AD TS. G17 C1O89) scsscanssws casssmswn seen cecarien scien c.sariatas SON ARS SUNN ua SMTANENO INS SNOT a 159 Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 oe ceeceecceeeceesneecseeceeeeeneesaeecseecaecnsnessaeecaeecsaecenessneesaeeseaeeseeesneesatessaeeeneeesnes passim Chambers v. Mississippi, A410 U.S. 284...
DOJ-OGR-00003713.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  691.8 KB
...The Defamation Action In 2008, two alleged Epstein victims brought an action under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) against the United States government purporting to challenge Epstein’s plea agreement. They alleged the government violated their CVRA rights by entering into the agreement. Seven years later, on December 30...
DOJ-OGR-00006224.jpg
OCR Confidence: 93%  •  658.8 KB
...14, 2012) (collecting cases); see, e.g., Highland Capital Mgmt. v. Schneider, 551 F. Supp. 2d 173, 182-183, 187 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). Finally, expert opinion should not be offered where it does not fit the facts of the case. “Expert testimony which does not relate to any...
DOJ-OGR-00021523.jpg
OCR Confidence: 88%  •  573.1 KB
...from the material witness or witn for the offe Assistant State Attorney Sworn to and subscribed to before me thic(s day of June, 2008. te of Florida : % STATE OF FLORIDA + PALM BEACH COUNTY | hereby Certify that the foregoing is a true copy sh JU "Bon in my office. © pease...
DOJ-OGR-00022093.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  721.8 KB
...roughly the same circumstances but against whom the law has not been enforced.” United States v. Lewis, 517 F.3d 20, 27 (1st Cir. 2008). Thomas alleges that there was an “almost identical incident in 2005 or 2006 wherein officers failed to conduct institutional counts or rounds and an inmate...
DOJ-OGR-00002585.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  702.8 KB
...Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation, November 2020) at x. In particular, the OPR concluded that Acosta “agreed to several unusual and problematic terms in the NPA...
DOJ-OGR-00004701.jpg
OCR Confidence: 93%  •  585.8 KB
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 293-4 Filed 05/25/21 Page5of5 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 4 of 21 —_ —_ had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United...
DOJ-OGR-00008238.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  691.3 KB
...an attorney’s advice as an element of a claim or defense.” Jn re County of Erie, 546 F.3d 222, 228 (2d Cir. 2008) (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted). The “quintessential example of an implied waiver of the privilege” occurs when a client asserts an advice-of-counsel...
DOJ-OGR-00000474.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  753.6 KB
...at 3. “In June 2008, the defendant pled guilty in [Florida] state court to one count of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution, a felony, and one count of solicitation of prostitution, [also] a felony. As a result, the defendant was designated as a sex offender...
DOJ-OGR-00005491.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  734.7 KB
...into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) with Jeffrey Epstein, which resolved the USAO- SDFL/Palm Beach FBI investigation into Epstein (the “Florida Investigation”) in 2008; (2) the USAO-SDFL did not charge Ms. Maxwell in its proposed indictment and did not immunize her by name in the NPA; and (3...
DOJ-OGR-00006453.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  734.2 KB
...into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) with Jeffrey Epstein, which resolved the USAO- SDFL/Palm Beach FBI investigation into Epstein (the “Florida Investigation”) in 2008; (2) the USAO-SDFL did not charge Ms. Maxwell in its proposed indictment and did not immunize her by name in the NPA; and (3...
DOJ-OGR-00008188.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  693.3 KB
...or otherwise serve as a vehicle for the factual history of the case. United States v. Mejia, 545 F.3d 179, 197 (2d Cir. 2008); see In re Fosamax, 645 F. Supp. 2d at 192. Testifying as to specific suggestive activities would also likely violate the rule against expert testimony...

Search Tips