Browse by Document Type
Other (98,409 documents)
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page24 of 26
We review a sentence for both procedural and substantive
reasonableness, which “amounts to review for abuse of discretion.” 2
We have e
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page25 of 26
where much of the abuse occurred and where Kellen worked.**° We
therefore hold that the District Court did not err in applying the
lea
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page18 of 26
broad discretion to decide Rule 33 motions based upon its evaluation
of the proof produced” and is shown deference on appeal.”
A Rule
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page16 of 26
statute as it is written.” If the statute “is ambiguous or contains no
express command regarding retroactivity, a reviewing court must
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page15 of 26
approach as opposed to a “categorical approach.”*? We see no reason
to depart from our reasoning in Weingarten. Accordingly, the questi
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page13 of 26
the actions and the duties of the U.S. Attorneys would be limited to
their own districts, absent any express exceptions.
Since 1789,
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page12 of 26
the United States Attorney(s) in each affected district and/or the
Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division.
Nothing befor
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page/ of 26
prospective jurors completed a lengthy questionnaire, with several
questions raising issues relevant to the trial. Based on the complete
App. No:
In the
Supreme Court of the Gnited States
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Petitioner,
Vv.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Undersigned counsel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746