DOJ-OGR-00010085.jpg

Cabas i202 Or Oc RGeD AS NL eminent G6 2? (Aiba ORS OP RekeAg eal Sf af3080 oH ub Wh NNN NN NP PRP HHP PPP PR UP WNP OW DOaRDM bBwWNHer OW A-5802 345 C2GFDAU3 Edelstein Catherine Conrad, Juror No. 1, was the suspended lawyer. It took us two weeks to feel sure enough to even start writing the brief that they were the same person. That's why the brief goes through in excruciating detail the overlapping addresses, the phone numbers, the data. I can see now in hindsight in reading it that perhaps that is the impression that was conveyed, Q. And again you could see -- A. But it was not the intent. Q. You can see the impression or one reading of the impression that's created is a false one, would you agree with me? A. No. Q. Well, the impression that's created in the brief is that you learned of the suspension only after you received the letter from the government, correct? A. I think the brief can also be read in a different way. I mean, if you start with the premise -- Q. I'm sorry, it was a simple question. It was a simple question. Doesn't the brief convey the notion that you learned of the suspension report after you received the letter from the government, yes or no? A. I can see now that it may be read that way, but that was not the intent. Q. Well, it was the intent because you and Ms. Brune had specifically decided that you weren't going to include what you SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010085