74 results for "plea agreement NPA immunity"

Page 1 of 3
DOJ-OGR-00002583.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  711.2 KB
...Maxwell was a co-conspirator of Epstein, she falls well within the protection provided by the NPA. Second, the government claims that the co-conspirator immunity provision applies only to prosecutions in the SDFL. But the NPA was a highly negotiated, non-standard agreement. It is not the standard agreement...
DOJ-OGR-00003884.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  742.3 KB
...The government argues that application of the co-conspirator immunity provision beyond the SDFL is barred by United States v. Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985) (per curiam), in which the Second Circuit stated that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for...
DOJ-OGR-00002977.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  865.3 KB
...2014) (rejecting defense argument that plea agreement barred prosecution for subsequent bail jumping, and, in interpreting the ° By its plain terms, the NPA did not immunize Epstein for his “background,” as the defendant suggests. (Def. Mot. 1 at 27). This provision refers, instead, to a list of “offenses” under federal...
DOJ-OGR-00003888.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  741.2 KB
...This suggestion is unsupported by any authority, and the government offers no explanation why its promises of third-party immunity should be held to a lower standard than other provisions of a plea agreement. 11 DOJ-OGR-00003888
DOJ-OGR-00002597.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  742.0 KB
...Thus, not only is Annabi readily distinguishable from this case, but it explicitly recognizes that plea agreements can be binding in other jurisdictions, and that a plea agreement that has the “affirmative appearance” of broad applicability—as the NPA does here—will be enforced according to its terms. The Second...
DOJ-OGR-00021751.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  672.3 KB
...plea bargain of another). The NPA, together with the Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (hereinafter, “OPR”), establish that the immunity given Ms. Maxwell precluded the United States from prosecuting her in the Southern District of New York or elsewhere. A. Ms. Maxwell has Standing to Enforce the Non-Prosecution Agreement...
DOJ-OGR-00002591.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  699.6 KB
...Maxwell should be permitted to take discovery regarding the intent of the parties to the NPA with respect to the co-conspirator immunity provision, and the Court should hold an evidentiary hearing in aid of this Motion. I. The Indictment Should Be Dismissed for Breach of the NPA. “Plea agreements...
DOJ-OGR-00003887.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  730.1 KB
...The government’s inability to provide a reasonable alternative explanation for its use of different language in the different provisions of the NPA removes any potential ambiguity from the co-conspirator immunity provision. But to the extent there remains any doubt, plea agreements must be construed “strictly against the government...
DOJ-OGR-00002978.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  725.6 KB
...These are plainly not the same crimes, and a plea agreement cannot be read to immunize unnamed crimes in the general ballpark of the specific crimes enumerated in the agreement. The defendant cites no authority that supports her overbroad reading of this provision. Accordingly, the NPA immunizes only certain, specific...
DOJ-OGR-00000048.tif
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  41.2 KB
...The parties certainly expected that the law of the Eleventh Circuit, where the NPA was entered into, would apply. Nevertheless, quoting Annabi, the Second Circuit held that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it...
DOJ-OGR-00021092.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  656.5 KB
Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page45 of 113 (“[D]ue process requires that the government adhere to the terms of any plea bargain or immunity agreement it makes”); Harvey, 791 F.2d at 300 (“[C]onstitutional and supervisory concerns require holding the Government to a greater...
DOJ-OGR-00000057.tif
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  42.4 KB
...immunity provided to the co-conspira- tors. The co-conspirator clause was subsequently severed from Epstein’s restrictive language and moved geographically below the 2255 as a consequence. The NPA was identified as a hybrid agreement where one section referred to the district-specific language and finding that the NPA...
DOJ-OGR-00003878.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  733.9 KB
...parties must have intended to limit co-conspirator immunity to specific statutory offenses committed between 2001 and 2007, even though—again—no such limitation appears in the text of the co- conspirator immunity provision. Notwithstanding the bedrock principle that plea agreements are construed strictly against the government, the government asks...
DOJ-OGR-00002589.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  614.4 KB
...The NPA makes clear that its identification of four “potential co-conspirators” by name—Kellen, Ross, Groff, and Marcinkova—was not intended to limit the immunity provision to those four individuals (“but not limited to”), and we ARGUMENT The Supreme Court has long recognized the enforceability of plea agreements. “[W...
DOJ-OGR-00021070.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  678.7 KB
...district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction.” is inapplicable here. Jd. at 672. But even if the immunity provision was ambiguous, which it is not, Annabi should not apply here because (1) the NPA originated in a district outside...
DOJ-OGR-00003883.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  688.6 KB
...Nor is it clear that Epstein could have withdrawn his plea had the NPA been breached while he was serving his sentence, given that the NPA—unlike a plea agreement—was not submitted to the state court in which Epstein entered his plea. DOJ-OGR-00003883
DOJ-OGR-00021836.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  645.6 KB
...Annabi should be overruled because its canon of construction for interpreting plea agreements conflicts with the authoritative decisions of other circuits that have addressed the issue and stands in tension with what the Supreme Court and this Circuit have written about plea and immunity agreements. DOJ-OGR-00021836
DOJ-OGR-00003882.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  756.8 KB
...As a third party immunized by the NPA, Ms. Maxwell has third-party beneficiary status to enforce it. While the government cites United States vy. Feldman, 939 F.3d 182 (2d Cir. 2019), for the proposition that “plea agreements differ from commercial contracts” (Opp. 18), the “differ[ence]” to which...
DOJ-OGR-00002595.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  697.3 KB
...The NPA stands in contrast to the standard non-prosecution agreement used in this District and other jurisdictions, which typically is explicitly limited to prohibit only prosecutions by the USAO for the district in which the plea is entered. The standard agreement in this District contains the following language: “It...
DOJ-OGR-00004713.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  735.6 KB
...that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction.” (Apr. Op. at 4). The defendant now moves to dismiss again based on the NPA. The bulk...
DOJ-OGR-00002596.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  733.6 KB
...In addition, the use of the term “the United States” in the co-conspirator immunity provision contrasts with the use elsewhere in the agreement of various terms that refer more specifically to the USAO- SDFL. When the government wanted a provision of the NPA to refer only to the USAO...
DOJ-OGR-00002980.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  745.0 KB
...In any event, even if third party beneficiaries had standing to enforce federal plea agreements, the defendant has failed to establish that she is a third party beneficiary of the NPA. In order to establish that she has enforceable rights under the NPA, the defendant must show that 19 DOJ...
DOJ-OGR-00021835.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  663.0 KB
...The Court, quoting Annabi held, that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction.” /d at 263. The Court applied Annabi even though the NPA had...
DOJ-OGR-00000071.tif
OCR Confidence: 93%  •  38.4 KB
...that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY. It is well established in our Circuit that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader...
DOJ-OGR-00002584.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  666.3 KB
...STATEMENT OF FACTS On or about September 24, 2007, Epstein and his counsel entered into the NPA with Acosta, the United States Attorney for the SDFL.* While USAOs in a number of judicial districts, including this District, typically use a standard template for plea agreements and other non-prosecution agreements...

Search Tips