879 results for "2003"
Page 26 of 36
DOJ-OGR-00009459.jpg
...769 (2003)).
“Tf Elected, J Promise [ [What Should Judicial Candidates Be
Allowed to Say? 35 Ind. L. Rev. 735 (2002).
Legal Ethics: Art or Theory?, 58 Annual Survey Am. L. 49 (2001).
The Anxiety of Influence, 27 Fla. St. L. Rev. 123 (1999) (discussing
rules that restrict multidisciplinary practice.
Can...
DOJ-OGR-00007134.jpg
...I do think
for girls under
and the course of
free to conclude,
for any
t to taking those
we
theless relevant with respect to the sex
It's
we should have been
that
the
we
based on
in 2002 and 2003 when Minor Victim-—-4
Epstein had
18 and...
DOJ-OGR-00010138.jpg
...769 (2003)).
“Tf Elected, J Promise [ [What Should Judicial Candidates Be
Allowed to Say? 35 Ind. L. Rev. 735 (2002).
Legal Ethics: Art or Theory?, 58 Annual Survey Am. L. 49 (2001).
The Anxiety of Influence, 27 Fla. St. L. Rev. 123 (1999) (discussing
rules that restrict multidisciplinary practice.
Can...
DOJ-OGR-00003894.jpg
...granting hearing where defendant submitted attorney affidavits
alleging oral agreement); United States v. Sattar, 272 F. Supp. 2d 348, 383 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)
(same). Ms. Maxwell’s contention that the plain language of the NPA reflects the parties’ intent
is not “conjecture,” and the Court cannot find to...
DOJ-OGR-00009588.jpg
...unless the charged offenses are the
same in fact and in law.’” (quoting United States v. Estrada, 320 F.3d 173, 180 (2d Cir. 2003)).
Although the Double Jeopardy Clause does not protect against simultaneous prosecutions for the
same offense, a defendant has a right not to be punished twice...
DOJ-OGR-00009607.jpg
...advantage over the accused” (quoting Marion, 404 U.S. at 324)); see
also United States v. Alameh, 341 F.3d 167, 176 (2d Cir. 2003) (“To show unjustifiable conduct,
a defendant must demonstrate that the government has intentionally used delay to gain unfair
tactical advantage.”); United States v. Delacruz, 970...
DOJ-OGR-00007830.jpg
...Duncan, 575 So.2d 1198
(1990) (remanded)
Assistant Public Defender, Rockland County (1984-85)
AWARDS
Pace Law School Outstanding Professor of the Year Award (May 23, 2004)
Pace Law School Outstanding Professor of the Year Award (May 18, 2003)
Pace Law School Outstanding Professor of the Year Award (May 19...
DOJ-OGR-00011208.jpg
...is
“properly within the district court’s discretion” to exclude the evidence. United States v. Bruce,
75 F. App’x 849, 851 (2d Cir. 2003); see United States v. Weiss, 930 F.2d 185, 199 (2d Cir. 1991)
(affirming exclusion of evidence that the defense disclosed to the government after...
DOJ-OGR-00021862.jpg
...Second, Maxwell argues that Counts Three, Four, and Six of the
Indictment are barred by the statute of limitations because the
extended statute of limitations provided by the 2003 amendment to
§ 3283 does not apply to pre-enactment conduct. In Landgraf v. USI
Film Products, the Supreme Court held that...
DOJ-OGR-00010404.jpg
...Government intentionally delayed the Indictment to gain a tactical advantage over the
Defendant. United States v. Alameh, 341 F.3d 167, 176 (2d Cir. 2003). The Court has twice
concluded that “nothing in the record indicates that the Government’s delay in bringing these
charges was designed to thwart Maxwell...
DOJ-OGR-00020048.jpg
...government
to conduct a review of the United Kingdom’s extradition arrangements, a review that formed the
basis of changes to the 2003 Extradition Act. Ud. Annex B § 3.1).
In Mr. Perry’s opinion, it is “highly unlikely that Ghislaine Maxwell would be able
successfully to resist extradition to...
DOJ-OGR-00003659.jpg
...The 2003 Amendment Does Not Apply Retroactively.
The government does not dispute that Landgraf is the appropriate framework for
determining whether a statute applies retroactively. Opp. 27. Under Landgraf, the first step is
“to determine whether Congress has expressly prescribed the statute’s proper reach”; if it has,
there is...
DOJ-OGR-00010565.jpg
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document670 - Filed 06/22/22 Page 30 of55
was still the lady of the house, supervising other staff, (GX 606), and flight records make clear that
the defendant and Kellen flew together on Epstein’s private planes approximately thirty-nine times
in 2003 and...
DOJ-OGR-00011372.jpg
...608, Advisory Committee Notes,
2003 Amendments. Here, Eva, Michelle, and Kelly’s testimony is not being offered to attack
Jane’s “character for truthfulness.” To the contrary, it is being offered to show that the
sexualized massages did not happen.
Jane has claimed that Eva, Michelle, and Kelly are essentially...
DOJ-OGR-00000016.jpg
...Second, Maxwell argues that Counts Three, Four, and Six of the
Indictment are barred by the statute of limitations because the
extended statute of limitations provided by the 2003 amendment to
§ 3283 does not apply to pre-enactment conduct. In Landgraf v. USI
Film Products, the Supreme Court held that...
DOJ-OGR-00003687.jpg
...The 2003 amendment to the statute of limitations applies to these offenses
Maxwell next contends that because the charged conduct took place before the
PROTECT Act’s enactment, that statute did not lengthen the statute of limitations applicable to
her alleged offenses. Here too, the Second Circuit has provided guidance...
DOJ-OGR-00008208.jpg
...kept confidential.” See Erie, 473 F.3d at 419; see also United
States v. Bergonzi, 216 F.R.D. 487, 494 (N.D. Cal. 2003) (addressing assertion of attorney-client
privilege in respect to documents sought by the defendant in a criminal case and holding that
privilege did not apply...
DOJ-OGR-00010710.jpg
...257,
271-272 (2003) (collecting cases). Courts have also considered poems, photographs, hand-crafted
items, and even multimedia video presentations. /d. Sarah’s and Elizabeth’s request to provide oral
testimony should not be denied.
Allowing Maxwell’s victims to speak will cause no unfair prejudice to Maxwell. As explained...
DOJ-OGR-00021809.jpg
...Second, Maxwell argues that Counts Three, Four, and Six of the
Indictment are barred by the statute of limitations because the
extended statute of limitations provided by the 2003 amendment to
§ 3283 does not apply to pre-enactment conduct. In Landgraf v. USI
Film Products, the Supreme Court held that...
DOJ-OGR-00021892.jpg
...Second, Maxwell argues that Counts Three, Four, and Six of the
Indictment are barred by the statute of limitations because the
extended statute of limitations provided by the 2003 amendment to
§ 3283 does not apply to pre-enactment conduct. In Landgraf v. USI
Film Products, the Supreme Court held that...
DOJ-OGR-00012622.jpg
...And then in 2003, left the state attorney's
office, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, and I was --
again, I had a weekend off and then on February [ believe it
was February 17th, I began full-time as the crime scene manager
for the Town of Palm Beach Police...
DOJ-OGR-00018209.jpg
...And then in 2003, left the state attorney's
office, 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, and I was --
again, I had a weekend off and then on February [ believe it
was February 17th, I began full-time as the crime scene manager
for the Town of Palm Beach Police...
DOJ-OGR-00014865.jpg
...Second, Maxwell argues that Counts Three, Four, and Six of the
Indictment are barred by the statute of limitations because the
extended statute of limitations provided by the 2003 amendment to
§ 3283 does not apply to pre-enactment conduct. In Landgraf v. USI
Film Products, the Supreme Court held that...
DOJ-OGR-00009473.jpg
...121. “Upholding the Law as Pretrial Publicity Goes Global,” New York Times, Sunday, April 27,
2003, Sec. 4 at 14.
17
DOJ-OGR-00009473
DOJ-OGR-00001130.jpg
...government
to conduct a review of the United Kingdom’s extradition arrangements, a review that formed the
basis of changes to the 2003 Extradition Act. Ud. Annex B § 3.1).
In Mr. Perry’s opinion, it is “highly unlikely that Ghislaine Maxwell would be able
successfully to resist extradition to...
Search Tips
- Use quotes for exact phrases:
"flight manifest" - Use OR for alternatives:
bank OR financial - Use wildcard for partial matches:
invest* - Exclude words:
document -redacted - Search names:
John Smith