Browse by Document Type
Court Filings (12,056 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document643_ Filed 03/11/22 Page 16 of 49
and then further show that a correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for
cause.’” Jd. at 815 (quoting McDon
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document643_ Filed 03/11/22 Page11of 49
service. According to this article, Juror 50 “went into the trial firmly believing that Maxwell was
‘innocent until proven guilty’ and v
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 _ Filed 03/11/22 Page 12 of 49
ARGUMENT
I. The Defendant’s Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied on the Current Record
A. Applicable Law
Federal Rule of Crimi
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 Filed 03/11/22 Page4of49
discovery and an expansive hearing—requests that present exactly the sort of “evil consequences”
of which the Second Circuit has warned: “
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 Filed 03/11/22 Page3of 49
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
AR RE RR RRs Xx
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-V.- i S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 Filed 03/11/22 Page 2 of 49
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT |... ee cececeeeccenecnsecneesaeeseeeseenaecnaecaaesaesseeeaeenaeenaessaesaeeseee 1
BACKGROUND
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 643 Filed 03/11/22 Page1of 49
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
AR RE RR RRs Xx
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-V.- i S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
CaéSasbt: 2@0Or0OCkEEPAGN DemumanitG422
AfiteORsPuVeE? Patpye @fdfolo = 1
LBG8MAXVD1
CéSasb: 2@20rOCRRSPAGN DomumesntGi2-t AltelORs2“y222 Paty’ 7lefdicso
Juror ID: 50
[ 33e. f- Do you or does any member of your family or a close friend personally know or
have past or present dealing
CéSasb: 2@20rOCRRSPAGN DomumeantGi2t AltehORs2“ye22 Pateyeeléfaicso
Juror ID; 5O
32a. If yes, please explain:
fi PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH CASE PARTICIPANTS
x. : The next subset of questions asks w
CéSasb: 2@20rOCRRSPAGN DomumesntGi2-t AltehORs2“y222 Pateygeslofaicso
Juror ID: HO
30b. | ‘Lf yes to 30, would this affect your ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror in
this case?
on Yes No
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 _ Filed 03/11/22 Page 61 of 66
no legal effect). Although Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure references
99 66
“pleadings,” “a district court has
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 32 of 66
that Juror Payton’s son had been injured in an explosion of a fire truck. /d. at 551. The
district court denied a motion for a new tri
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 31 of 66
invidious as an intentionally false answer. United States v. Langford, 990 F.2d 65, 68 (2d
Cir. 1993).'! As the Second Circuit held in
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 21 of 66
3. Theinterview with Reuters
The same day the Daily Mail published its article, Reuters also published a story
based on an interview
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 14 of 66
again. Jd. at 13. The defense responded in part that "asking the questions live when the
jurors' reactions, hesitations, explanations
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 12 of 66
If a potential juror selected either “yes” option, the questionnaire asked individuals
to explain their answer in writing, to state wh
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 640 Filed 03/10/22 Pagelof1
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK pocH
DATE FILED: 3/10/22
United States
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 1 of 66
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------+- +--+ xX
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
y 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 639 Filed 03/09/22 Pagelof1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT pian
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee |
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 3.
United States of America,
_y_
20-CR-330 (AJN)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document638 _ Filed 03/09/22 Page 16 of 29
Juror ID: 80
Do you or does any member of your family or a close friend personally know or
have past or present dealings with any of
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 638 Filed 03/09/22 Page 15 of 29
Juror ID: 50
If yes, please explain:
ERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH CASE PARTICIPANTS
The next subset of questions asks whether you or a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 638 Filed 03/09/22 Page 14 of 29
Juror ID: 50
If yes to 30, would this affect your ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror in
this case?
o Yes
If yes to 30b,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 637 Filed 03/09/22
Page 1 of 2
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT poc#
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 3/9/22 __
ween eee
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 636 Filed 03/01/22 Page1of22
800 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
COHEN & GRESSER LLP +1 212.957 7600 phone
www.cohengresser.com
Christian R. Everdell
+1 (212) 957-76
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 635 _ Filed 03/01/22 Page4of4
Page 4
based solely on the evidence presented at trial and my instructions on the law?
e At the time you were selected as a juror, did
_ Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 635 _ Filed 03/01/22 Page1of4
oN U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Pla
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 632 Filed 03/07/22 Page7of8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
wee eee ee eee eee eee ee ee eee eee eee xX
United States : ORDER
Vv. : S2 20
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 632 Filed 03/07/22 Page5of8
UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
wee eee ee eee eee eee ee ee eee eee eee xX
United States : DECLARATION
Vv. :
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 632 Filed 03/07/22 Page3of8
U.S. Department of Justice
Criminal Division
Office of the Assistant Attorney General Washington, D.C. 20530
Mar 7, 2022
The Honorable D
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 632 Filed 03/07/22 Page1of8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
wee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee x APPLICATION FOR IMMUNITY
United States :
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 632 Filed 03/07/22 Page2of8
Southern District of New York respectfully requests the Court to issue an order requiring
HE «(© give testimony at the March 8, 2022 hearin
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document631 Filed 03/03/22 Page1of2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
United States of America, DATE F
Caasb: 2ROrOCRRBP AEN DcumesntGZy AfibehOReORs222 Pagpeye afat 2
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
oO msec 950 17th Street
DOCUMENT Suite 1000
ELECTRONICALLY FILED Denver, Colorad
_ Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 628 Filed 03/02/22 Page 1 of 2
a U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Pla
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 628 Filed 03/02/22 Page2of2
Page 2
not need four attorneys to be present to observe the questioning of Juror 50 and participate in the
hearing. Any desire the defend
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document627 Filed 03/02/22 Pagelof2
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
oO 950 17th Street
Suite 1000
Denver, Colorado 80202
PH 303.831.7364
FX 303.832.2628
_ Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 625 Filed 03/02/22 Page1of1
oN U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 624 Filed 03/02/22 Pagelof1
SPODEK
LAW
Todd A. Spodek, Esq.
GROUP.«. Direct Dial: aa teen
Treating you like family since 1976
[email protected]
March 1, 2022
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page51of51
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, the Government respectfully submits that the Court should
grant the defendant’s motion as to
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page 48 of 51
Because the defendant cannot meet her “heavy burden” of establishing either element of
unconstitutional delay, Cornielle, 171 F.3d at 7
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page 41of51
inquired about Epstein’s residences in an effort to cast doubt on Jane’s recollections of events. In
addition, the defendant listed as a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page 34of51
It makes no difference, as the defendant argues, that both crimes involved grooming minors
for sexual abuse. (Def. Mot. at 23-24). As Dr.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page 24of51
is all that is required. United States v. Salmonese, 352 F.3d 608, 622 (2d Cir. 2003). And in any
event, Jane recalled the incident of ab
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page 23 o0f51
3. No Variance Occurred
For similar reasons, no variance occurred at trial. The evidence at trial did not prove any
facts materially d
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page2of51
Table of Contents
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT | csccsmerncnnamnancninna nanan cena 2
LEGAL STANDARD sss icmnnmnancim anni acne nmn aa aOR TE ER
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page1of51
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bs S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document620_ Filed 02/25/22 Page 20 of 21
the Defendant’s motion for a new trial. Cf Carbon Inv. Partners, LLC v. Bressler, No. 20-cv-
3617 (ER), 2020 WL 5441497, at *2 (S.D.N.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document620_ Filed 02/25/22 Page19of 21
The Court concludes that the Defendant has not made a showing that any pre-hearing
discovery is appropriate, and the request to engage
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document620 _ Filed 02/25/22 Page5of21
The Defendant urges this Court to resolve the motion on the papers, without the need for
a hearing. Maxwell Br. at 28. But resolving the