Browse by Document Type
Court Filings (12,056 documents)
_ Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 441-1 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2of3
: U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Pla
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 442 Filed 11/12/21 Page1of12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 441-1 Filed 11/12/21 Page3of3
Page 2
Please be advised that the above list is limited to the individuals the Government may refer
to as co-conspirators at trial. Whil
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 441 Filed 11/12/21 Page12of12
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on October 18, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing Ghislaine
Maxwell’s Motion to Pre
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 441 Filed 11/12/21 Page 7of12
Ill. The Failure to Disclose Prevents Defense Cross Examination at Trial and
Facilitates the Presentation of False Testimony
None of the
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 441 Filed 11/12/21 Page6of12
rejected by the Court which ordered disclosure at the same time as the government's witness list,
Rule 404(b) notice, exhibits, and 3500 m
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 441 Filed 11/12/21 Page1of12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
wee xX
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
y : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
De
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page 40 of 40
ensure that only relevant evidence and arguments are presented at trial, and that the defense be
precluded from offering inflammatory,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page 38 of 40
The defense also argues that they should be permitted to elicit information that the Minor
Victims engaged in voluntary acts, because
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page 21 of 40
private rather than public,” which avoids “catering” to “sensational” interests. (Gov’t Mot. at 16
(quoting United States v. Amodeo, 7
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page 20 of 40
Finally, the defense argues that this motion is purely tactical on the part of the Government,
because this motion affords sympathy to
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page19 of 40
to make the point. She does not. Much of this information can be elicited without using names at
all, such as Minor Victim-4’s past sta
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page6 of 40
As noted in the Government’s motion, an order imposing privacy safeguards at trial for
victims of sex crimes is commonplace. See Aug. 3,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page4of40
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
The Government respectfully submits this memorandum of law in further support of its
October 18, 2021 motions in lim
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 440 Filed 11/12/21 Page1of40
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bs S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant
Case 1:1Ga8P A126 GAGS SHBARnerPacementctee-6n FERS B6Ge2d5/1 Nate AbdGe 4 of 15
Terms of the Agreement:
1. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nolo contendere) to the Indictment as
currently pending ag
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 _ Filed 11/12/21 Page 62 of 69
VIII. THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO LIMIT THE INTRODUCTION OF MS.
MAXWELL’S STATEMENTS IS PREMATURE AND SHOULD BE DENIED AT
THIS TIME
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 _ Filed 11/12/21 Page 58 of 69
purpose or agreement with any co-conspirator to facilitate an illegal objective. The ill-founded
motion should be denied.
A. The Go
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 _ Filed 11/12/21 Page 50 of 69
no authority indicating that more is required. Indeed, the government’s demand for a proffer is
nothing more than an attempt to forc
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 _ Filed 11/12/21 Page 53 of 69
government has provided "notice" tha ae .:: a "victim" in this case, and has disclosed
a number of exhibits related to her — school
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 _ Filed 11/12/21 Page 38 of 69
whom the government identified as a victim of his offenses so that they could sue him for
damages in civil lawsuits. See NPA at 4 wa
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 _ Filed 11/12/21 Page 31 of 69
I. SUPPRESSION OF THE EXHIBITS IS CONTRARY TO WELL-
ESTABLISHED SECOND CIRCUIT LAW
At this point, everyone associated with this lit
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 _ Filed 11/12/21 Page 24 of 69
The movant bears the burden of proof to show factors that outweigh the ordinary
presumption of judicial openness. Doe v. Cook Cty.,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 Filed 11/12/21 Page 3 of 69
Ill. EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT ABOUT PRIOR CHARGING DECISIONS AND THE
COURSE OF PRIOR INVESTIGATIONS IS ADMISSIBLE ...............ccccccec
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2 of 69
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .........cccecsecsesscssessesseseessecseveccneeseesaeseesaesaessesaeeeeeneeseenaeseesaesateate
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 Filed 11/12/21 Page1of69
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defend
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page 53 of 54
the court to declare the defendant the prevailing party in that suit, because Minor Victim-2 had
dismissed the case with prejudice in
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page 54 of 54
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, the Government respectfully requests that the Court grant the
Government’s in limine moti
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page 35 of54
value of such evidence is substantially outweighed by the unfair prejudice to the Government
and risk of distracting the jury or encour
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page 33 of 54
(see generally Dep’t of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility Report, Dkt. No. 293 Ex. A
at v-vi), evidence or argument on th
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page17 of 54
disclosure of such information will identify the Minor Victims with particularity, and thus
subject them to harassment, retaliation, an
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page13 of 54
examination of other witnesses; (2) preclude the defense from eliciting personal identifying
information for the Minor Victims, Witness
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page8of54
Zhong, No. 16 Cr. 614 (DLI), 2018 WL 6173430, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2018) (granting
government’s motion to have victim witnesses testif
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2 of54
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT uuu... cc cccscssssscssssccsscsecscssecscsssssssscscescssecseseescsessessacsecseseecseseesecsas
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page5of54
protect against unnecessary public disclosure of their identities, in order to protect the Minor
Victims from potential harassment from th
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page4of54
relatedly, the Government moves to preclude the defendant from making the baseless claim at
trial that she is a victim herself. Eleventh,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 438 Filed 11/12/21 Page1of54
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
~V.- S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defend
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 437 Filed 11/10/21 Pagelof1
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ac
DATE FILED: 11/10/21 _ |]
United St
Caash: 22OrOCKBPAEN Dunument4ee AiitetiiMW2 Payeys oft 7
Page 5
Defense position:
In light of the Court’s ruling on the government’s motion in limine, the defense will accept
the government’s propo
Caash: 22OrOCKBP AEN Donument4ee AitetiiM21 Payee Gfdt 7
Page 3
Government requests that the Court direct prospective jurors to read the sheet and to raise a hand
if they are familiar with the witne
Caash: 22OrOCKBP AEN Donument4ee AitetiiiM2 Payee dict 7
Page 4
prejudice to the defendant, as the instruction makes clear to the jury that the identities of the
witnesses are being protected from t
Céasb: 2@20rOCRRSPAGN Demument4e2 Abbey Paétpege aft 7
. U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
EPSGATS —_ ' One Saint Andrew’s
Page 2
The Government submits that this nomenclature can be used when trial begins on
November 29, 2021, but that the parties should be directed to continue referencing victims and
witnesses on the
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document435 _ Filed 11/11/21 Page11of11
pursuant to Rule 401 and not unduly prejudicial. As discussed, the jury may extrapolate from the
opinions that the presence of a third p
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 435 Filed 11/11/21 Page9of11
average person,” and so appropriate for expert testimony. United States v. Felder, 993 F.3d 57,
72 (2d Cir. 2021). Nor would admission of
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 435 Filed 11/11/21 Page5of11
Circuit in United States v. Johnson, 860 F.3d 1133, 1141 (8th Cir. 2017), and the District of
Massachusetts in Doe ex rel. Pike v. Pike, 4
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 435 Filed 11/11/21 Page1ofi1
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT |
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #;
DATE FILED: 11/11/21
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Unite
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 433 Filed 11/11/21 Pagelof1
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Cy
HADDON
MORGAN
FOREMAN
November 11, 2021
VIA ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Souther District of New York
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 100
oO Oo oO NO oO FF WO NBS =|
NO RO RO NO DYMO NO FF FF FF fF Fs AFresodAFreOhdUoPAFrhUErFX)hUcM
a FPF WwW NYO F|F- OD O&O fo N OO AFD FP WO DBS =|
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 432-1 Filed 11/10/21