74 results for "plea agreement NPA immunity"

Page 2 of 3
DOJ-OGR-00000071.tif
OCR Confidence: 93%  •  38.4 KB
...that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY. It is well established in our Circuit that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader...
DOJ-OGR-00021856.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  551.5 KB
...that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY. It is well established in our Circuit that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement 9 See, e...
DOJ-OGR-00000010.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  545.3 KB
...that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY. It is well established in our Circuit that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement 9 See, e...
DOJ-OGR-00014859.jpg
OCR Confidence: 93%  •  559.4 KB
...that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY. It is well established in our Circuit that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement 9 See, e...
DOJ-OGR-00021803.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  545.6 KB
...that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY. It is well established in our Circuit that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement 9 See, e...
DOJ-OGR-00021886.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  545.6 KB
...that the NPA with USAO-SDFL does not bind USAO-SDNY. It is well established in our Circuit that “[a] plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless it affirmatively appears that the agreement 9 See, e...
DOJ-OGR-00002587.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  733.0 KB
...Thus, the NPA limits the benefit to Epstein to immunity “in this District.” Next, the NPA sets forth 13 provisions labeled “Terms of the Agreement.” These include the details of Epstein’s guilty plea and proposed sentence in the Florida state court, as well as Epstein’s agreement to waive...
DOJ-OGR-00021075.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  568.2 KB
...On September 24, 2007, the Government and Epstein entered into a nonprosecution agreement. The NPA immunized Maxwell as a “potential co- conspirator.” A. TheNPA The NPA begins with several factual recitals. The recitals state, among other things, that (1) the “United States Attorney’s Office” and the Federal Bureau of...
DOJ-OGR-00021758.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  672.2 KB
Case 22-1426, Document 87, 07/27/2023, 3548202, Page16 of 35 agreement. SA100, SA105 fn.122. However, that language, limiting co-conspirator immunity to the Southern District of Florida, was removed from the final signed NPA. SA166-167fn.237, fn.239, & fn.240. The intentional excision of this limiting...
DOJ-OGR-00002607.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  724.7 KB
...course of the plea negotiations,” and that the defendant’s evidence was “sufficient in these circumstances” to require the district court to take such action. Id. at 190. Unlike the agreement in Fe/dman, the NPA here contains no integration clause, and the co-conspirator immunity provision, on its face...
DOJ-OGR-00004716.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  806.5 KB
...Like Annabi itself, those cases evaluate the text and history of plea agreements to determine the scope of the immunity provided by those agreements, including by application of the affirmative appearance rule. See, e.g., United States v. Prisco, 391 F. App’x 920, 921 (2d Cir. 2010) (summary order...
DOJ-OGR-00003880.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  698.3 KB
...2012), where a corporation had entered into a plea agreement that immunized its employees, the court held that one of those employees had standing to enforce the agreement as a third-party beneficiary by virtue of his employment; the court did not require a showing that the parties thought about...
DOJ-OGR-00000254.tif
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  41.8 KB
...Accordingly, Petitioner can rely on the immunity clause in the NPA. See, e.g., United States v. Florida West Intl Airways, 853 F.Supp.2d 1209, 1228 (S.D. Fla. 2012) (dismissing indictment against employee who fell within the class of employees described in plea agreement). The government’s suggestion...
DOJ-OGR-00004717.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  765.0 KB
...a plea agreement does not bind another district unless it affirmatively appears otherwise. Under this clear rule, this Court has already held that the NPA does not bind this District. To be sure, if the NPA applied in this District—and if Maxwell could invoke it—the > In her motion...
DOJ-OGR-00002968.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  733.4 KB
...Second, the defendant’s argument acknowledges that the plain terms of the NPA immunized Epstein from prosecution in “this District,” that is, the Southern District of Florida. See NPA at 2 (“After timely fulfilling all the terms and conditions of the Agreement, no DOJ-OGR- 00002968
DOJ-OGR-00002602.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  656.1 KB
...the government, in drafting the agreement, to ensure that such limitations were included. Having failed to do so, the government may not now ask this Court to read limitations into the co-conspirator immunity provision that it did not include at the time the NPA was negotiated. 25 DOJ-OGR...
DOJ-OGR-00021681.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  664.4 KB
...expressly sought and obtained broader immunity for his co-conspirators than he did for himself. (See also SA107 n.125 (observing that a supervisor at the USAO-SDFL “pointed out that the NPA was not a 3 Maxwell also relies on draft plea agreements which “expressly defined the term ‘United...
DOJ-OGR-00003886.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  814.9 KB
...at 8-9 (citing examples of NPA’s explicit references to USAO-SDFL). While the government is correct that the use of the term “the United States” in a plea agreement, without more, is insufficient under Annabi and its progeny to demonstrate an intent to bind other districts, the NPA...
DOJ-OGR-00021678.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  658.7 KB
...By its terms, the NPA only applies to prosecutions brought by the USAO-SDFL. The agreement was signed “on the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida.” (A.175). And in exchange for Epstein’s plea in state court, the USAO-SDFL agreed...
DOJ-OGR-00000123.tif
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  38.3 KB
...an eviden- tiary hearing as to the parties’ intent in the NPA. The Court finds no basis to do so. The cases Maxwell cites where courts held hearings on the scope of a plea agreement mostly involved oral agreements where there was no written record of the full set of...
DOJ-OGR-00000058.tif
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  39.0 KB
16 the other was the more expansive global federal part of the NPA. Third, as every circuit recognizes (including the Second and Seventh), it is a well- settled proposition that ambiguities in a plea agreement are to be resolved against the government. See, e.g., In re Altro, 180 F...
DOJ-OGR-00004284.jpg
OCR Confidence: 94%  •  753.1 KB
...Here, the co-conspirator provision of the NPA provides that if Epstein abides by the terms of the agreement, “the United States” will not institute any criminal charges “against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein,” which immunizes Ms. Maxwell for the offenses covered by the NPA. (Ex. B at 5...
DOJ-OGR-00023175.tif
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  77.0 KB
...agreements not involving cooperation, OPR examined Departmental policies relating to plea offers to assess the propriety of the NPA’s charge and sentence requirements. OPR also examined the provision declining to prosecute Epstein’s unidentified “potential co-conspirators,” to determine whether that provision violated Departmental policy regarding grants of immunity...
DOJ-OGR-00003339.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  1130.5 KB
...agreements not involving cooperation, OPR examined Departmental policies relating to plea offers to assess the propriety of the NPA’s charge and sentence requirements. OPR also examined the provision declining to prosecute Epstein’s unidentified “potential co-conspirators,” to determine whether that provision violated Departmental policy regarding grants of immunity...
DOJ-OGR-00004461.jpg
OCR Confidence: 95%  •  1131.4 KB
...agreements not involving cooperation, OPR examined Departmental policies relating to plea offers to assess the propriety of the NPA’s charge and sentence requirements. OPR also examined the provision declining to prosecute Epstein’s unidentified “potential co-conspirators,” to determine whether that provision violated Departmental policy regarding grants of immunity...

Search Tips