...150 (1972)... cccccceeeeeeeeeees 8, 13, 14 Commonwealth v. Cosby, 666 Pa. 416, 252 A.3d 1092 (Pa. 2021)..... 14 In re Altro, 180 F.3d 372 (2d Cir. 1999)... ee 16 Margalli-Olvera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 43 F.3d 345 (8th Cir. 1994)... 10, 15 Santobello v. New...

...Correctional Center 150 Park Row New York, New York 10007 Office: 646.8365:7 10) “This message is intended for official use and may contain SENSITIVE information. If this message contains SENSITIVE information, it should be properly delivered, labeled, stored, and disposed of according to policy.” Page 1972 DOJ-OGR...

...Correctional Center 150 Park Row New York, New York 10007 Office: 646.8365:7 10) “This message is intended for official use and may contain SENSITIVE information. If this message contains SENSITIVE information, it should be properly delivered, labeled, stored, and disposed of according to policy.” Page 1972 DOJ-OGR...

...150 1972)... cc eee eee 12 McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 (1969)... eee ee 4,5 Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 184 (2012)... eee ee 4,7 Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129 (2009). 0... cece eee eee 4 Umited States v. Amani Investments...

...150 (1972) occ ccccce cece cece cece eeenseceeeeeseecseeenseseseeccseecsaeeseseeeecseeenseensesesseesseeenseenes passim Jones v. Jago, S75 F.2d 1164 (6th Cir, 1978) oo... ceceeccecccecccsceesceseceseeeaecneecseeceeeseceaecraeceaeeseeseeeeeeseeaeeeeeeeeseeeees 9 Kyles v. Whitley, S14 U.S. 419 (1995) ooo ccccccceccceseceseceaecneesaeeseeeseessecnaeesaecsessaeeseeaeenaeenaesaeesseeeeeseenseenaeeneeeas 9,11 Strickler v. Greene, S27 U.S. 263 (1999) oo .cccecccccccscseecesecseeseesseessessecuaeceaeeseesseeseessecnseseaeeaeesaeeeesaeesaeceaecaeeseeeseeeeenaes 12 United States v. Bagley, A473...

...150 (1972)... ceccccccceceeeeceeeseaeeceeeeeececeeneeecaeeseaeeceueeeeaaeseneeeesaes 19, 20 DOJ-OGR-00021053

...150 (1972)... eee eeeeeeeee 10 Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Atr Prods. Co., B36 U.S. 271 (1949)... es eetececreneesenecnsnsesecesnssesessenenes 13 Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 568 U.S. 519 (2018)... ee eeetececneesenecseneeseeesseneesssesssnaeseee 9 Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995) oo. eeteceeeteeteeeeeee 13 Margalli-Olvera v...

...150 (1972) occ ceccccccccceeneeesneeeeaneceeeeeaeeceeneeecaeeeeaeeceeeeeaeeceeneeecaeeeeaneseaneneas 10 In re Altro, 180 F.3d 372 (2d Cir, 1999)... ccecceccccceseeeeeseeeeeeceneeesaeceeeeeenaeeseaeeceueeseaaeseeneesaae 12 In re Arnett, 804 F.2d 1200 (11th Cir. 1986)... cece cecceesseeceeeeeesaeeeeeeeeeeeeeaeeceeeeeenaeeeeeeeeeaeees 14 Little v. U.S., Nos. 1:08-cr-59, 1:09-cv-822, 2010 WL 3942749 (S.D. Ohio Oct...

...150, 154 (1972). Recognizing that one prosecutor can bind all prosecutor, the Justice Manual instructs prosecutors that non-prosecution agreements should “be drawn in DOJ-OGR-00000212

...150 (1972) eee eeeesessseseeeseesecnsecneesaeeseesseesseeaeseesaeeseee passim In re Sealed Case, 121 F.3d 729 (D.C. Cir, 1997)... cceccececsescesecnsecnseseeseesseesaeenaesaeesaeeseeeeeenaee 26 In re Terrorist Bombings of U.S. Embassies in E. Africa, 552 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2008)... 15 Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995) eee eceecesecsecsseseeseesseeaecaecseesaeeseesseesaeenaesaeesseeseeeeresaeed 19 Nid...

...150 (1972). Motion at 1. I. Legal Standards A. Rule 16 Rule 16 requires the Government to “permit the defendant to inspect and to copy or photograph books, papers, documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or places, or copies or portions of any of these items, if the item is...

...150 (1972) require the Government to disclose to defendants certain evidence that will aid their defense. Brady requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Under Giglio, the Government has a duty to produce “not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key government witness.” United States...

...150, 154 (1972) (“The prosecutor’s office is an entity and as such it is the spokesman for the Government. A promise made by one attorney must be attributed, for these purposes, to the Government’’) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 272). These premises are inconsistent with the notion that a...

...150, 154 (1972) (“The prosecutor’s office is an entity and as such it is the spokesman for the Government. A promise made by one attorney must be attributed, for these purposes, to the Government”) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 272). These premises are inconsistent with the notion that a...

...150 (1972), and its progeny. Such information must be disclosed sufficiently in advance of trial in order for the defendant to make effective use of it at trial or at such other time as the Court may order.' ' This Order does not purport to set forth an exhaustive list of...

...150 (1972), and its progeny. Such information must be disclosed sufficiently in advance of trial in order for the defendant to make effective use of it at trial or at such other time as the Court may order. The foregoing obligations are continuing ones and apply to materials that become...

...150, 154 (1972). Yet despite this binding precedent, the Second Circuit refuses to hold its United States prosecutors to the promises that other United States prosecutors have made on behalf of the United States, instead clinging to the position that a plea agreement binds only the district in which it...

...150 (1972)), and that “ambiguities in a plea agreement are to be resolved against the govern- ment,” Pet. 16. But those arguments merely beg the questions of what promises the NPA did make and whether the NPA is ambiguous. As explained above, the NPA’s coconspirators clause, read in context...

...150 (1972)... eecceescesecnsesseesseeseessecaecnaesaeescesseeaecsaeenaesaeescesseeaecsaeenaesaeseceseeesaeenaeenaeeas 13 In re Wild, 955 F.3d 1196 (11th Cir.), reh’g en banc granted, opinion vacated, 967 F.3d 1285 CLE aie, Bn surnam onan rin 05h. 8.08568 S98 SS SA WTR ERA P AR EPR AG STAR SAI ED OED 11 Index Fund, Inc...

...150, 154 (1972) (“The prosecutor’s office is an entity and as such it is the spokesman for the Government. A promise made by one attorney must be attributed, for these purposes, to the Government.”). At the barest minimum, a federal prosecutor has a duty to check the entire file...

...150, 154 (1972) (government has duty to disclose material affecting reliability of government witnesses). The court’s authority, or lack thereof, to order disclosures under Rules 16 and 26.2 does not affect the defendant’s right to Brady material. “It is, of course, a fundamental axiom of American law...

...150 (1972); e disclosure of any co-conspirator statements and a hearing to determine their admissibility; and e accelerated production of Jencks Act material, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3500, a government witness list, and any evidence the government intends to introduce at trial pursuant to Federal Rule of...

...150 (1972). eeeceecssessseseeeseeeecnsecsesaeeseesseesaeenaesseesaeeseesseeaeenaesaaeseeeeee 16 Giuffre v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 0.0... cesecesseessesesseesesensenessnesaesseesnseees 6 Klein v. Weidner, Civ. No. 08-3798, 2017 WL 2834260 (E.D. Pa. June 30, 2017)... 17 Manhattan Review LLC v. Yun, 16 Civ. 0102 (LAK) (JCF), 2017 WL...

...150 (1972); see also United States v. Coppa, 267 F.3d 132, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2001). Evidence is “material” in this sense only if “its suppression undermines confidence in the outcome of a trial.” United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 678 (1985). “The rationale underlying Brady is...

...150 (1972) compelling the government to ° See Motion Under the Fourth Amendment, Martindell, and the Fifth Amendment to Suppress All Evidence Obtained from the Government’s Subpoena iii and to Dismiss Counts Five and Six. 11 DOJ-OGR- 00002708